this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
68 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

34698 readers
625 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago

Fuck yeah!

The fact that they had to pay $1 Billion to Figma is the cherry on the cake. I hope they get a change of management and stay independent.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

Adobe has to pay Figma $1 billion for terminating the deal.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Balls? Of course.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Adobe will abandon its $20 billion takeover of the design software maker Figma, the two companies said on Monday, bowing to growing regulatory opposition to the deal on both sides of the Atlantic.

The deal’s price tag was twice what the privately held Figma had raised in its most recent fund-raising round, underscoring how badly Adobe wanted a foothold in the sector.

While the companies have argued that they largely do not compete — except for one Adobe product that hasn’t gained much traction — regulators said the takeover could forestall future rivalries and lead to higher prices for consumers.

It became clear in recent weeks, he added, that the path to approval was narrowing, and abandoning the deal would provide more certainty to both companies’ employees and customers.

The decision is another win for tougher antitrust enforcement: A day earlier, Illumina, a big gene-sequencing company, said it would sell the cancer test maker Grail, which it had bought for $7 billion, after an appeals court endorsed the Federal Trade Commission’s argument that the union would “substantially reduce competition.”

Most notable was Microsoft’s $69 billion takeover of the video game giant Activision Blizzard; that deal closed in October after drawing objections from the F.T.C.


The original article contains 547 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nice. All corporate mergers are anti-consumer and anti-worker.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Yes. Billion dollar companies should not be able to buy other companies, period.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Figma Newtons