top 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 83 points 3 years ago* (3 children)

Meaningless as long as they continue to use the site/app and give him ad revenue.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Publications like these lower reddit’s future valuations though. I’m not sure whether a two-day uptick in users is worth that. My guess would be that it’s not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    This is what I see as the true value of these "protest" messages above just "more user engagement" since it seems like more eyes on negative press does more damage than the plus of "a few more users interacted with our site for a few days"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago*

    Agreed. People keep saying that investors can be bamboozled by numbers of any kind, because they are not familiar with Reddit, because they don’t understand the technology, etc etc, but investors do know how to read, and a lot of them also know how to read the room. They might be rich scumbags who don’t understand the internet, but I am willing to bet that a lot of people who might be interested in buying Reddit understand people, and therefore, understand that you can’t run a business that defines itself as an online community when you have pissed off a whole lot of the people who make up that community.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Love that the French guillotine gets it's own mention 😂

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Unfortunately, in the same breath as that mention is them saying erasing that is the work of users. There's enough evidence to suggest it's the admin's handiwork. Some people elsewhere mentioned that those "random" dots do not have a user attached to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The random noise appeard nearly instantly after the guillotine was completed, there is no way regular users caught on to that that fast.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Even if we give it the benefit of the doubt and say that maybe a group have waited until the guillotine have finished to strike back, it would have been traced back to actual users if they were indeed actual users.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It all disappeared within a few seconds after no fighting beforehand, and in the absence of an undiscovered 50k pro spez discord server that no one knows about, it's definitely admins. They've gotten much smarter though, using a ton of older accounts as bots rather than editing their personal accounts to have no cool down

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Oh no, r?ddit admins being sneaky cheaters? How the hell could anyone have predicted that! Lol!

    I've never really bothered with /r/place even in its earlier incarnations, but this just made glad I've never bothered with it, at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›