all 36 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 95 points 2 hours ago (6 children)

She's AIPACS tool. She calls herself a "nonjewish zionist". They hate for no reason whatsoever, based on ethnicity.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 hours ago (5 children)

    The parties reaction to this will be telling. Anything less than expulsion from the party is unacceptable. Her being the neoliberal establishment pick, even if she was clearly defeated. Makes me wonder if they're just going to try to burn it all down on the way out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 55 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    “Congresswoman Stevens is not a current member of the Michigan Democratic Party, nor will she be in the future,” Michigan Democratic Party Chair Curtis Hertel wrote on X Sunday.

    source

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 2 hours ago (5 children)

    The state party officials need to expel her from the party. Even if it would only have a symbolic effect they need to make clear that this is unacceptable for anyone who calls themselves a Democrat. If moderates ask progressives to "vote blue no matter who" and then turn around to endorse collaborators then they need to get the boot.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 48 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

    “Congresswoman Stevens is not a current member of the Michigan Democratic Party, nor will she be in the future,” Michigan Democratic Party Chair Curtis Hertel wrote on X Sunday.

    source

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

    "Senate Democrats are united in our support for Abdul El-Sayed, because we know he will fight for the economic interests of working families in Michigan, unlike Mike Rogers, who is a tool of Donald Trump and billionaire donors," [Chuck Schumer] said.

    For once Schumer is 100% right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 hours ago

    I thought this felt familiar and now I remember why. In the NYC mayor race, one Democratic candidate, Jessica Ramos, had the endorsement of the Working Families Party, but since she was struggling to gain traction she ended up endorsing Cuomo with the hopes of gaining a role in his potential administration. Everyone was equally shocked then and WFP immediately revoked their endorsement of her.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

    Speed running her way to becoming the next John fetterman

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    Anyone "stunned" by corporate Democrats being DINOs isn't paying attention.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    Clearly the person we all knew she was.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 2 hours ago
    [–] 16 points 2 hours ago

    Why are they shocked, she was always an Israeli slave

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    Is she still on the ballot for her current position? Hoping she needed to give that up to run for senate.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 hour ago

    No. She is the incumbent and still in office. She lost to Abdul in the primary though and has refused to endorse him unless he sucked fascist cock [paraphrased but that's what she essentially demanded]. He told her to pound sand and she went over to support Abdul's republican opponent in the general.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 hours ago
    [+] -17 points 2 hours ago (8 children)

    Even though THIS FORMER ELECTED DEMOCRAT is Voting Republican now YOU Must vote Blue No Matter Who! UNLESS she Doesn't like the Blue THEN vote Red!

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 hours ago (7 children)

    ... No still vote blue, El-Sayed appears to be a decent guy. She lost the primary and clearly it was a good thing she lost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 hours ago (6 children)

    Yeah, I don't understand why they're trolling this particular subject so hard. They posted similar sentiment on another post about an adjacent subject.

    Like, she lost the primary already, she sucks, we get it. The guy on the docket is much better, and is repping Dem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 child)

    Yeah, gosh. This one seems more targeted to "vote blue no matter who" than the last one. I guess this person really is trolling to try to undermine votes for El-Sayed. Or, of course, they're welcome to break character and clarify.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 24 minutes ago

    Or you could check their post history: when it comes to Republican hypocrisy they are being sarcastic, not supportive. This person does this on a lot of political threads and almost every Epstein-related thread. I enjoy seeing them personally, but a lot of folks don't appreciate it.

    Read it again in that light and see how it comes off. Maybe I'll stand corrected, but I have yet to see one that didn't work as sarcasm with added hyperbole.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

    Check out their post history. It's satire.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments