Hacker reverse engineers his Samsung TV and finds on-device AI listening for your dog and baby, watching what you watch, and borrowing your soundbar's mic if the TV doesn't have one. Then OpenAI banned him for reverse-engineering it.

Source:

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 15 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Yup, Smart TV's of any brand (at least in the US) are essentially spyware. I made a video about it recently.

The upside is that if you don't connect your TV to the Internet, all that data just sits in its internal memory and doesn't go anywhere. So don't connect it.

The weirdest thing in all this is that it's Texas, of all places, leading the charge to hold these TV manufacturers accountable. (And Ken Paxton, the most cartoonishly corrupt politician in recent memory at that.)

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

    I suspect that it won't be long until keeping it off your home network is meaningless.

    Many smart devices already search for and connect to open networks. Not an issue for most tech-savvy people who maintain their own networks, but there are a lot of people out there that either don't know or don't care that their telecom-provided gateways maintain an open wireless network by default, in addition to their private networks for home use.

    My pessimistic take: the intent behind this is to create a de-facto mesh for IoT devices in areas where people live close to each other, i.e. apartment buildings and townhomes.

    Integrated cellular modems are relatively inexpensive; it's not too far of a reach to think that soon, IoT devices won't need to rely on wifi to send their surveillance reports targeted marketing data.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 522 points 4 days ago (81 children)

    Their own harnesses breaking out of their test environments and hacking third party companies is “oopsi” but their customers using an agent in a controlled manner to reverse engineer firmware of a device they own is bad. I see. Fuckers.

  • source
  • hideshow 81 child comments
  • [–] 147 points 4 days ago (18 children)

    Corporations gonna corporate.

    It's high time we had a revolution of our own in North America to chase out these corporate barons that own every little minute aspect of our lives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • load more comments (16 replies)
  • load more comments (62 replies)
    [–] 74 points 4 days ago (5 children)

    One of the things that AI is actually useful for. Banned!

    Hey guys, I am starting to think AI isn't actually for us.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

    "Shifted it to the consumer"

    • The "Guest Consent" Clause: For example, Section 6(d) of LG's updated terms of service states that it is the owner's sole responsibility to obtain consent from household members and guests whose voices might be captured by the TV's artificial intelligence and voice recognition features.

    • The Legal Trap: By agreeing to these terms, you contractually accept the responsibility to warn anyone sitting in your living room that the TV is listening. If a guest sues over an illegal recording under state wiretap laws, the manufacturer will use the EULA to argue that you breached the contract by failing to get that guest's consent. That's assuming someone actually reads the EULA

    Especially in

    • California • Delaware • Florida • Illinois • Maryland • Massachusetts • Montana • Nevada • New Hampshire • Pennsylvania • Washington

    because they have all-party consent laws : In these states, recording an oral conversation requires the consent of everyone involved. Because a house guest has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a private home, a smart TV capturing their background audio without their explicit knowledge constitutes a violation of state wiretapping laws, regardless of what the TV's EULA say

    So, you have to have everyone in your household agree to the EULA not just yourself if you use a smart tv in those 11 states to not violate wiretapping laws.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    6 mos into owning a Samsung TV, I started getting ads.

    So I put a pihole on my network which fixed it but I also started seeing the ENORMOUS amount of times ALL my samsung devices were being blocked. I'm talking THOUSANDS per day per device. Like the TV would be blocked 1,200 times in one day, my samsung smartphone would also be blocked 1,000+ times per day while my wife's iphone that she uses for every and all social media was being blocked maybe 100 times.

    Since then I've never bought another Samsung device and hooked an apple tv up to my Samsung TV while disconnecting the tv from the internet. It's fucking disgusting how you buy their product and still get milked for data/money.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 174 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (17 children)

    Why do people post things like this in twitter? Why can't they write it up in a single blog post on a site that does not require users to authenticate to view the whole thread? I have never understood these long twitter threads.

    Edit: I just remembered that there is a solution for this: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2113014142600953868.html but it's still ridiculous that an app needs to exist to aggregate dispirate tweets, and of course it doesn't work with the parent tweets because they're not all one thread. Also this app quit working during the twitter API debacle, which is why I forgot about it, but it looks like it's back.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 119 points 4 days ago* (13 children)

    It's entirely the wrong format for it. Same as using Discord in place of old text forums. I will rant for HOURS to anyone who will listen about how Discord is an apocalypse and has completely wiped any documentation off the face of the internet for soooo many projects. It's not searchable or indexed, and even if they make a good discord forum it's like writing questions and answers on toilet paper and wiping your ass with it after 30 minutes. Moderators and admins constantly complain about people not reading the FAQ or asking the same questions over and over... I WONDER WHY THAT IS. HMMM? MIGHT IT BE BECAUSE NOBODY CAN SEARCH ANYTHING AND YOUR FAQ IS GARBAGE!??! MAYBE ASKING QUESTIONS IS THE ONLY WAY TO GET A FUCKING ANSWER!!! (MAYBE. IF YOU'RE LUCKY AND SOMEONE WHO KNOWS THE ANSWER SEES YOUR QUESTIONS LIVE AT THAT MOMENT AND RESPONDS)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    Summarizing a discord channel into a usable format would be an excellent use for an LLM.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 20 hours ago

    Or people can just use the right format instead of making an LLM play pick up 52 million.

    I agree it could make something slightly more useable than discord's current state but it would be a bandaid fix that doesn't solve the core problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (8 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 136 points 4 days ago (9 children)

    In case anyone was ever curious if AI could be used against our corporate masters, here's your answer.

    I suspect that if the AI industry ever gets any sort of regulation, it will be to wrench any kind of power that end users have that may threaten the capitalistic hegemony away from them. Can't have people reverse engineering their tech to figure out how they are using it to spy on you, cuz THAT'S CYBER ABUSE! :/

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 47 points 4 days ago

    You are only allowed to use ai for evil

  • source
  • [–] 131 points 4 days ago (37 children)

    Everybody declared me an idiot when I didn’t hook up my smart tv to the internet. This is why

  • source
  • hideshow 37 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 37 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (8 children)

    LoL

    This "advanced tech" that's based on stolen IP won't even give you the lyrics to Happy Birthday to You.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 23 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    Kimi K3.1 incoming 👾 Fuck this shit restricting REA / reverse engineering anything "DRM / encrypted" etc.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 117 points 4 days ago*

    It's no surprise. They're all in bed together.

    Softbank invested $122 billion in Open AI: https://tracxn.com/d/companies/openai/__kElhSG7uVGeFk1i71Co9-nwFtmtyMVT7f-YHMn4TFBg/funding-and-investors

    Lee Jae-yong and Masayoshi Son Join Forces... Samsung and SoftBank to Collaborate on '6G and AI Network' Development

    https://www.thelec.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=5132

    The bosses of Samsung Electronics, OpenAI, and SoftBank held a three-way meeting in South Korea to discuss potential collaboration in AI. Samsung Electronics Executive Chairman Lee Jae-yong met OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son at Samsung’s office in Seoul on Tuesday.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    This is why I don't connect my tv to the internet. My wife was super Luke warm about this when I told her about it, and we have a new Samsung TV, with their stupid AI in it...sigh.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 29 points 4 days ago

    So gross. I hope this gets more recognition by big news outlets / investigations. And then eventually regulation

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    This is one of the reasons why I don’t use American AI chatbots.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 4 days ago (22 children)

    I have a related question: how feasible is it that a smart TV with wifi turned off can access the wifi connection of connected devices? E.g. a firestick, in my case.

    I'm a web developer by day, my gut says a TV probably shouldn't be able to override a literal on/off setting, but I also know that a software setting is barely enforceable at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • load more comments (22 replies)
    [–] 16 points 3 days ago

    Wild, maybe they should ban all those "rogue" AI bots we keep hearing about too

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Claude banned reverse engineering in general in their products... the ai will just stop the answer

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 3 days ago

    "banned". There's nothing banned with AI, you just can't access it... they, on the other hand, can use everything they've got on us. That means: collect all our data and use it to screw our lives

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 63 points 4 days ago* (3 children)

    Yeah I used to think the whole "At home data center" guys were insane but personally I'm digging up my old GPU's to get a small rig going. Nothing insane but enough to run some light weight models.

    1. The AI techies were right, this is a revolutionary technology and 2. The companies that own it are evil in a no-joke-actually-evil-like-comic-book-evil kind of way. they-will-destroy-the-climate-and-world-just-to-be-the-one-that-did-it kind of way. Humans-are-too-expensive-kill-them type of way.

    Time to build your rigs and pull down some open source models before the criminals (openai, et al) stick telemetry in them to track your usage. Get your own wiki reader while you're at it...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 69 points 4 days ago (6 children)

    What the fuck is "cyber abuse?"

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 20 points 4 days ago (5 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›