I was having struggles reading theory. It takes me forever to get through a couple pages of State and Revolution. Back when I read it, it took me almost an hour to get through like ten pages of Lenin's Imperialism and actually internalize what he was saying instead of zoning out midway through. I'm starting to think it may be because Lenin and Marx write like you're intimately familiar with everything going on, but I've got a very big gap in my history education and I find that it makes it harder to read their works. Add to that the fact that their English is a little antiquated and I just have difficulties putting it together. I tried to read another book—Capitalizing on Crisis—that was recommended to me on an anticapitalist reading list, and I had some serious difficulty there too. Much moreso than S&R. I also had problems with Origin of the Family and it feels like just reading a preface is an automatic non-starter for reading for me. Blackshirts and Reds was an easy read though.

Randomly, I was at Barnes and Noble the other day and decided to pick Fujimoto's Fire Punch and read it. Somehow I got through the whole thing in 12 hours, with a 3 hour break in the middle to take an exam and drive somewhere. Probably the most thematically dense manga I've ever read. Would love to do a literary analysis on it but that'd be hella time consuming and I wouldn't even know where to start.

Anyways, I digress, point is I wanted to ask if anyone else here struggled with reading like this? Maybe it's the ebooks, I know I've never liked ebooks, but I read half the manga online. Then again I guess a picturebook is easier lol.

all 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I think sometimes we feel we ought to read something but we just aren't finding it interesting enough to hold our attention. You can clearly read quickly and easily when it's something you're really enjoying.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago

    One of the reasons you might have problem with Lenin and marx's writings could be because of which version you read. I myself didn't have that much trouble because i read the ones hosted on prolewiki (currently down unfortunatly, I have some works downloaded if you want) which have additional notes on people and events the books themselves don't go into. I'm not sure if English is your first language but if it isn't, to my experience, translated versions also do a good job of giving additional information about those. So you could also try those instead.

    But yeah, origin of the family is just a weird read. I didn't have any problem while reading Marx and Lenin but origin of the family was just annoying and somewhat boring to read.

    And as other comrades have said you kind of need to get used to it. These authors lived a hundred years (and more) before us and language changes a lot within that time. It's only natural to not feel instantly connected to their way of writing. As you read more it will become normal to you.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 17 hours ago

    I found it helpful to practice reading by reading fiction in order to build up the tolerance for non-fiction. Short Stories also help build up a tolerance for reading longer books.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 18 hours ago

    Theory can be dense and the unusual language can make it more difficult to get through. What you are describing is very normal until you have gotten used to it. You can try reading something more casual like a fantasy novel to relax in between reading theory.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 19 hours ago

    +1 for audiobooks and if you're like me you'll want a mechanical task you don't have to pay attention to

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    I’d say that’s probably not uncommon. Try audiobooks that’s how I read a few that were just too dense for me. There’s also like a study guide/student version of Marx’s Capital that was really helpful. Luna Oi helped publish or write (both?) a book on dialectical materialism and those were easier to understand than some of the older theory books. There’s also nothing wrong with taking breaks. I stopped reading outright communist books for a bit to read parapolitical books and now I want to go back to theory.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 13 points 19 hours ago*

    I will say that Stalin's Dialectical & Historical Materialism was the easiest of the typically recommended classical communist literature to read. It was honestly more engaging to me than Blackshirts and Reds to the point I was disappointed it was so short. The words for that one flowed straight off the page for me for whatever reason, and to this date it has probably been the most significant work in my journey to understand materialism as a philosophy. Maybe it just has to do with the presence vs lack of historical context? I don't recall any specific historical events being mentioned in Stalin's work—or at least none that required substantial context to make sense—whereas in S&R and other ML works, there is usually some form of historical event going on that the authors consistently reference.

    Regardless, I'll check out Luna Oi's study guide. Thanks for the recommendation!

  • source
  • parent