21
‘What are you implying?’: El-Sayed confronts critics head-on as attacks ramp up (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 21 minutes ago by to c/politics@lemmy.world
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

As a candidate positioned at the center of what researchers say are the worst Islamophobic attacks seen since the aftermath of 9/11, many would expect Abdul El-Sayed to simply defend himself and move on.

Instead, the Democratic candidate for US Senate in Michigan has repeatedly demanded those who question his positions on Israel, the Muslim Brotherhood and his faith, explain the premise of their inquiry. Rather than let others put his loyalties on trial, he has tried to put their assumptions on trial.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 11 minutes ago*

He answered and stated his position clearly then went on to question the motivations of the inquirer.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 5 points 8 minutes ago

    Another article about this ignoring that the shithead with the question refused to disavow trying to make his religious rules law.

    It's right at the end of the video of the exchange, dude just says "no" and walks out.

    But especially after finding out how connected this guy and his family are to Republicans, that needs to be what people focus on.

    Because it applies to everywhere, and can get better turnout all over the country from it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •