top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 8 points 3 hours ago

I recently read "The Rose Field", the final book in the series Book of Dust by Philip Pullman. It's a follow up trilogy on His Dark Materials, which recently had a TV series adaptation made by the BBC, and previously a film was made back in like 2006, "The Golden Compass."

Pullman writes a story about a world where people's souls live outside of their bodies, taking the shape of an animal that speaks and lives side by side with their person. He calls it their Daemon, and it's a terrific narrative device.

In the second book of this second series one of the main cast, Pan (a Daemon) leaves the other protagonist Lyra (Pan's human) in order to find the latter's imagination, which he believed that she had lost. Over the journey, they both separately ponder the nature of Imagination, why Pan had gone to such lengths to find something he wasn't sure about. Lyra is also tasked with finding "The Alkahest", of which she has never heard of.

In the end, they both find their answers, the importance of imagination, and what Alkahest truly is. I think Pullman has observed how the world is changing, how imagination, play, creativity, and interpersonal relationships are left to wither to make room for money. I'll quote some bits of it here.

Spoiler for the climax of "The Rose Field" by Philip Pullman

It is the universal solvent, just as it says in the encyclopedia. The destroyer of bonds. Look at what’s happening here—all the old ways and habits that brought people together, like bartering and trading—just dissolved. Wiped away by new ways people don’t fully understand. The new roads that go who knows where but just tear up the rose gardens and knock down perfectly good houses.

What’s the closest bond there is? It’s between people and their dæmons. Somehow when you’re separated, like we are, the bond is still there, but this isn’t the same at all. With the sickness here, people just seem indifferent. They’re not interested anymore. But it’s not just happening here. It’s every kind of bond, in our world as well. Like the new Master of Jordan, breaking the old connection between me and the college, because I was costing them too much. It sounded so reasonable when he said it. Money. They had to save money, because…Everything about the alkahest is reasonable. It’s reasonable to make money, to save money…

“All being dissolved. The more I see, the more obvious it seems…I really think I’m beginning to understand at last. Everything having to give way to money.”

Of course people have always knocked things down and built other things in their place. But money’s different somehow. It swallows everything… […] But Thuringia Potash and all these other companies are only interested in the rose oil as a unit of value. If an acre of roses makes money, fine, but because the roses and the oil themselves aren’t important, they’ll tear them up in a moment. All those fields being dug up: it isn’t because the developers hate the roses, it’s because they can make more per acre by growing peanuts, or by building a factory.”

“The thing that troubles me most […] It’s something like this. In making rose oil, each part of the process is an end in itself. The roses are beautiful as they grow. Distilling the rosewater and making the oil are crafts worth knowing, things worth doing in themselves, things you can get better at and take pride in. So people who did them used to have a connection with the soil and the seasons and the light and the weather, and they felt the sun and the wind and the rain on their skins—the alkahest will change all that. They’ll soon be sitting in offices under artificial light, entering figures into ledgers and account books, and their dæmons will be dying beside them, and no one will care, and no one will know why.”

What I take from this is that money has this effect of always taking a precedent. It makes sense for it to, because it is the means with which we navigate a capitalist society. We've constructed society in such a way that everything always has to give way to money some way or another. By letting money take precedent, we're destroying our bonds to other people, we're destroying our bonds to nature, and we're destroying our bonds to ourselves, our creativity, our imagination, and we do so while giving ourselves completely reasonable justifications for it.

The message that we're slowly killing our souls isn't exactly subtle, but I get it. We've gotten to a point where some people are happy to outsource their thinking and creativity to machines, all in the service of money. People build fake followings on social media, just to make money.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 5 hours ago*

    I think your cut-off should be more 2024-ish, as decent prose wasn’t really “a thing” until 2025. We saw the first vibe-written shit about that time.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 6 hours ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 hour ago* (2 children)

    haha. LESS than one star average. how is that even possible

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    There should be some great centralized wall of shame for stuff like this, auther publishers editors distributors sellers included.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 hours ago

    I so hope they posted this in the reviews

  • source
  • [–] 177 points 12 hours ago (6 children)

    Insane that these people think they deserve money for something they didn't bother writing, nor even proofreading themselves. I truly hope they have to suffer a devastating financial situation, its what they deserve

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 child)

    Many wealthy, powerful people take credit that they don't deserve and earn an enormous profit for doing so. It is a common enough belief that having enough money or power to enable someone else's idea makes the enabler as, if not more, important and deserving than all of those involved in every other aspect of the project.

    What has "AI" become, after all? Rich and powerful people stealing the entire collective knowledge and creative works of humanity, mostly without just compensation or even consent. They then combine that collection and a vast quantity of wealth to take as many resources as they can afford to, half in an effort to deny those same resources to competitors trying to do the same thing. Their goal is to become the most dominant source of truth and creativity, which they will then hoard and rent to the highest bidders. All the while promising the good it will do, while simultaneously manipulating the output of this "source" so that it more reflects their interests and worldview.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 11 hours ago

    Yeah, we as a society have long since abandoned the idea that you have to have done hard work yourself to be deserving of praise or recognition. At this point, if something exists, and nobody else is claiming that they made it (or if you have enough power to say it louder than they can) you're free to do so, and feel proud of your accomplishment regardless of whether any effort was made on your part at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 9 hours ago

    Last Christmas a friend of the family I was visiting bragged about her son who had an LLM spit out fantasy books that he was selling on amazon. As far as I can tell, he just prompted it “Write a fantasy book like The Witcher” and sold it without reading it. She excitedly told me “I looked into it, it isn’t plagiarism!”

    Sometimes I absently daydream about ruining the day for everyone and insisting on driving home the point that it very much is plagiarism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago

    It's like Trump with "Art of the Deal". He didn't write it, he paid someone else to write it.

    Now, people can do this with AI.

    Both should be unacceptable in my opinion, but how can you stop it? Hacks gonna hack

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

    Do people not use editors any more? Jfc how does this happen?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

    As someone who has worked in print for 20 years you would be surprised how often stupid shit goes to print and no one catches it despite multiple people looking at it throughout the processes before it gets to me at the end point.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 12 hours ago

    At least you got a warning that the book wasn't even worth an editor nor the "author" actually reading through it once themselves.

  • source
  • [–] 48 points 13 hours ago (10 children)

    Books written prior to 2022 just used a ghost writer from fiver

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

    You can still do that. And on Upwork.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 12 hours ago (9 children)

    I recently hired a couple beta readers for a novel I wrote, and explained that there was zero AI writing, ot was all human hands.

    About half of the proposals said it would be nice to get a break from beta reading people's AI-written novels. Which is just mind blowing to me that people that get an LLM to write Python script that creates 20 md files that get stitched into a "book" and publish the results bother to care that much in the first place. Why not have the LLM copyedit it, too?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    Yeah, one of my friends is an author and told me that while industry is a nightmare now. Lots of publishers would hold writing contests to give new authors a chance to get some exposure. Apparently they're just absolutely flooded with AI content now to the point that many are cancelling the contests.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 10 hours ago

    That, and KDP also scoops up a lot of the mediocre ones to start, and filter out successful ones they can scoop up later without eating time and money on discovery. Publishers can afford to be picky these days... I say as I prepare to throw my work at the stone walls of these same places in hopes of not getting relegated to being one more person self-publishing a passion piece.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    when I finally get hunkered down and write the novel I've been trying to get out of my brain for nearly a decade, I actually feel a little bit of hope getting it out in an environment like this. I'm always super harsh on myself, but I mean it's pretty hard to twist 'hey I wrote this book with my own thoughts! no llm needed!' in a bad way

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 10 hours ago

    The biggest hurdle for humans to write a good book really is the hunkering down and doing it part. I think AI could actually be useful here in that you have it generate a first draft, read it, get so angry at how bad it is, and suddenly you're motivated to write a much better version.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 14 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

    How long before NPR unwittingly interviews an AI "author"?

    https://www.npr.org/sections/author-interviews/

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›