thats cool
I'm still not going to use a platform with a closed source back end.
thats cool
I'm still not going to use a platform with a closed source back end.
So that's all they had on him? Or all the gov asked for?
I will have to re-visit telegrams privacy policy at some point, but aren't they known for storing quite a lot of info (at least when compared to other private messengers like Signal?)
Telegram (also known as Telegram Messenger) is a Russian-Emirati ... instant messaging (IM) service. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegram_(software)
Enough said. Anyone who uses this service is a tool of the lowest level. I've had better screwdrivers.
That's at least three points of data we know Signal can't and won't share.
Requests that signal had to respond to do seem to include this: https://signal.org/bigbrother/
Specifically: https://signal.org/bigbrother/santa-clara-county/
lmao who told you that?
The data Telegram is sharing is right there
And we know Signal doesn't and can't because of its architecture and we've seen similar letters they had unsealed
You seem to be confused about what Signal protects against, or claims to protect against.
None of the items from your list apply. Maybe you're confusing it with another distributed solution with peers connected through anonymous transport.
all 19 comments