top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 5 hours ago*

As a Tor user, I will not patronise an anti-Tor establishment.

Access to amtrak.com was deniedYou don't have authorization to view this page.
HTTP ERROR 403

In light of all of Amtrak’s other problems, they have a looong way to go.

I would be tempted to try train-hopping on freight trains.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 hours ago

    car industry would lobby any meaningful change to it.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago

    What is the bottom right graph and what is the source for it? Looks interesting

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 15 hours ago

    Spent a couple of weeks in Japan and got to take the shinkansen twice. Of course Tokyo's subway system was awesome aside from shutting down at midnight but I had no problems getting around in Osaka or Kyoto either. The shinkansen is so dope it's hard to describe. They provided the best views I got of Fuji on the way down to Osaka and back from Kyoto. I tried to get a picture of a passing train but it was over in a blink. I took a train from San Francisco to Chicago and it took 3 days. The scenery was beautiful but the roomlette was like trying to sleep in the Disneyland Star Tours ride. 3 days proved too long to rely on edibles and sublingual distillate and I ended up with CHS. The southerly route back was awful, nothing but the drabbest of views and I didn't get a roomlette for the trip back and trying to sleep in economy was very difficult and uncomfortable.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 15 hours ago

    My brother bringing the receipts!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 16 hours ago

    If only people tended to live together in big conglomerations this would be so much easier to solve!

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

    Hilarious! Love it! "one free checked car per passenger" is gold.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

    To be fair, only one time in my adult life have I flown somewhere and NOT rented a car as soon as I landed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

    I have traveled all over the world and I have never driven a car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago*

    I'm in my 50s (weep), have visited* 60 countries, and lived in 4 of them - and have never driven a car, much less owned one, since the day I passed my test.

    People don't rent a hire car because they need to, they do it because it's their programmed default.

    .* visited == spent at least one night in, not including airports

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

    My friend showed me a map of their snowbird parents' neighbourhood in AZ and it's literally an hour walk to the nearest non-house with zero bus service.

    Rest of the world can't comprehend such levels of car-brainedness.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago

    If you visited my area you wouldn't have to drive one. You could even get a hotel with a shuttle, and if you stayed downtown you could walk a lot of places. But if you wanted to go anywhere other than walking from your hotel you'd have to hire an Uber. If you were near the part of town where I live, there are zero options other than cars.

    I have traveled a lot of the world also. But I don't like cities, nor do I visit them. When I visit countries I like to visit mountains, wilderness and remote villages and camp in the wild under the stars. I have rented many 4x4s.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 21 hours ago* (6 children)

    It's a complicated problem. Part of it is that Amtrak is so broken that people wonder if it's even fixable.

    I recently went to a concert in another city for my birthday. I looked into what Amtrak options there were, because I get panic attacks in traffic, and they only offer overnight service, with a middle of the night swap from bus to train. It also would have cost $250 round trip for two tickets vs <$100 in gas to drive, and taken 12 hours vs the 7 to drive.

    So instead of taking the extra time off work, we wound up driving, and I had multiple panic attacks instead.

    Another part of the problem is that the US likes to talk about whether or not people deserve transit options. Like, my local bus only comes by four times a day between 6am and 6pm, but because I live in a low-income area, I apparently don't even deserve a bench at the bus stop.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

    the worst part of Amtrak is how often it's late, making it not only more expensive than driving or flying but also less reliable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 18 hours ago* (3 children)

    Old story. That happens when so much of the tracks is owned by freight rail, so little proper passenger rail infrastructure exists and laws that would require passenger rails to be given priority being so weakly enforced and largely ignored, never mind that the infrastructure is maintained as freight rail needs it, which is really bad for passenger rail purposes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 36 points 1 day ago* (11 children)

    I guess it's covered by 5., but the real, actual reason we can't have trains is the civil engineering firms can't extract infinite money from a completed railway.

    Also, have you considered how any public works project that runs longer than a single term of the elected official who gets it approved, is letting the next guy get all the credit for it? That's much worse than having functional mass transit.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 child)

    Have you looked at railway maps?

    There's a huge sprawling rainwater network across America... It's just only used by freight cause the bastards that own it decided passengers are unprofitable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago

    Assuming rail autocorrected to rainwater, agreed. There are interesting parallels between rail in the 1800s and the life cycle of the internet - successful network technology explodes in utility and popularity, then is cannibalized and constricted

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I guess it’s covered by 5., but the real, actual reason we can’t have trains is the civil engineering firms can’t extract infinite money from a completed railway.

    Actually, they kinda can. Railroad tracks need upkeep just like roads do. Maybe not to the same degree and maybe the costs work out differently but they do need to be maintained. So there's plenty of opportunity to grift the hell out of a railroad buildout.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago*

    I was assuming the repair would be done by a different firm, but that's fair. It probably ends the cost-plus contract that the construction firm had, at a minimum.

    In seriousness the problem seems to be the contract doesn't incentivize the correct behavior, but I would love to hear from someone with actual knowledge on the topic.

    Also, maybe there are too many opportunities to kill projects via zoning ordinances, and its inarguable that oil, auto, and other industries actively combat these projects.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

    California seems to be good at infinite money extraction for rail that never finishes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

    The conservatives that filed the many, many lawsuits that delayed construction over and over again are the same people complaining about how long it's taking to be completed. They caused the delays and are the most vocal about the delays. It makes no sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 21 hours ago

    I thought this was going to annoy me but it was hilarious

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 day ago (11 children)

    What I don't get is why people are okay with all-day drives that could be comfy train rides. Not to mention commute traffic jams of everyone going in the same direction at the same time every workmorning and workevening.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 16 hours ago

    Honest answer? Partly because I can operate on my schedule and not the train’s schedule. And the rest of it is getting to have adventures along the way that otherwise would mean getting off the train, finding a bus, taking a long bus ride to the thing, taking a long bus ride back to the train, getting on the train again…

    Sometimes I drive to Seattle, sometimes I take the train. There are times when I like the relaxing ‘let someone else get me there’ vibes, but there are times when the train schedule doesn’t work with my schedule, or I want to check stuff out on route, like fun restaurants I’ve read about, cool educational places, silly tourist traps…

    I remember seeing a sign for ‘World’s Largest Egg!’ one trip, so I just took that exit and went to find the World’s Largest Egg, because why not?

    And another reason is sometimes I just don’t want to be around a lot of people. One crowded train trip up I was treated to a child that felt the best way to pass the time on the 3.5-hour journey was to scream. A lot. It was also a trip where I’d forgotten my headphones. Not fun.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago

    Ive heard maybe a dozen or so people whip out the ol "if everyone at the light hit the gas at the same time, at least 3+ more cars could get through the intersection"

    If only there were some way to connect these many single cars into one vehicle... And if only it were cheaper... And faster... And didnt have to stop as often...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I also can’t comprehend all-day drives over all-day trains. If I take a train on my own or with my family, those are (partially) actionable hours. I can read a book, grab a coffee, work on my laptop, draw with my kid. If I go by car, best I can do is a podcast.

    Since I don’t own a car, my point of view is also biased by not having to make sense of a large investment. But if you factor is the costs of having the car, gas and tolls… I’d rather go by train. If necessary, I can rent a car at my arrival destination.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 4 points 21 hours ago

    I live on a hill in Alaska, am I qualified to be an urban transpotstion person or do you need to live in the denali mountain range?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago

    Fits more with c/fuck cars, but solid meme and welcome here

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›