Does this mean I will, or won't be able to install the FOSS version through GitHub? Trying to stop repackagers from selling your project is one thing, but killing the source available installs would be another.
post
"bitwarden apps will be the commercially licensed builds." I don't understand how this is going to change anything.
I self-host vaultwarden. I use the official Bitwarden app, it works swimmingly. Going the self-hosted route you get enterprise features (I don't use em).
Doesn't the licensing stuff connect with the backend not the app?
It just blows my mind how so many comments use the term 'purchase' as if this new enshitification step still allowed for the dictionary meaning of the word.
I used to suggest bitwarden to everyone, now it's basically 'start using KeePass, keep a copy of your db in a USB drive in your safe, have fun'.
replies:
Well, i was planning to move from my 1password to bitwarden. No need for that now.
So, will you still be able to use the builds with the free license? Does that mean that the App Store builds will be locked down?
Pretty much seen it coming when the new CEO came in and removed the words "Transparency" and "Always Free" from the official marketing.
replies:
zoo what does this s mean?
If you are on Lemmy, theres very high probability that you also have the technical abilities required to self host Vaultwarden and stop relying on a greedy company for your most critical aspect.
replies:
load more comments
(1 reply)
Fantastic. I'm tired of having to change password managers. DashLane, Keepass, LastPass, etc., they all end up shooting their own foot somehow.
replies:
I really don’t want to have to switch password managers again.
replies:
load more comments
(13 replies)
view more:
next ›
top 50 comments