200
Sandwich Order. [20] (thelemmy.club)
submitted 6 days ago* by [M] to c/Mimi@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Not everything. You'd need to sandwich the whole universe, or whole multiverse if that exists https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/126064959

all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 20 points 6 days ago (16 children)

You triggered my rant! The term universe means all-encompassing. Therefore if such a structure called 'multiverse' were to exist, it would, by definition, be a substructure of our universe and not multiple universes. The term 'multiverse' is an oxymoron, with emphasis on -moron.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 20 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    It's a rant of!

    The meaning of words change. For example, 'atom' means undivisible which was thought to be the case when the term was coined. Since then we've discovered that the atom is in fact divisible. In the same way, when the term 'universe' was first introduced, it was thought of to be all-encompassing. Now, a multiverse hasn't been proven, and might very well be unprovable, but if it ever happens, the term will continue to be used, despite being a linguistic oxymoron. Just like the atom.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 6 points 6 days ago (5 children)

    I'M. NOT. A. MORON.

    ...ahem. fair enough. But what would you call the "universes" in the multiverse structure then? Dimensions isn't right either

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago (2 children)

    How do these multiverses work? Sliders rules, Loki rules, Everything Everywhere All At Once rules? We might just call it a timeline, or a frequency, or something based on how one detects or travels between them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Never heard of those rules. Mind giving an explanation?

    Personally in my story telling, I like to interpret them like computer virtual machines. An universe handles its own sub universes.

    Traveling between them can only be done up or down. Cannot go to siblings universes directly. And to do it, you need to wrap the part of the fabric of reality that makes you into a translation layer for the target universe. Prevents any star Trek transporter ethical issues

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    besides, the bread isn't in there

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 17 points 6 days ago

    was sort of expecting just two slices of bread, but "they're the wrong way round" so that everything is inside.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 12 points 6 days ago* (2 children)

    That sandwich doesn’t contain everything. She’s not in it. Neither is the dude.

    That would be a very different comic, though

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
    • [–] 12 points 6 days ago

    Sucked… into… a bagel.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 2 points 5 days ago

    "Just a light snack, it is" -the disguised Galactus as he's paying

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 1 point 6 days ago (2 children)

    What planet is that

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •