top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 81 points 6 days ago (2 children)

There are 15 people at best getting coffee in that first image

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 6 days ago (11 children)

    That's more like 10 people on the first image

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 days ago (6 children)

    I was gonna say, these people moat likely dirve by themselves. And probably live less than a km away

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 6 days ago* (2 children)

    Eh, don't be too sure about only living a km away. I know growing up the nearest grocery store was about 12 km away. The nearest place to get coffee was further away.

    Fast forward to today the nearest grocery store is only 1.5 km away, but there's no sidewalk and the road is so narrow that you can't walk on the shoulder. You could ride a bike, but there's no bike lane so you'll be hoping the whole way that no one runs you over.

    The car issue is a lot more complex than "American Lazy LOL" it's an infrastructure issue that was set in to effect almost 50 years before I was born. Designed to serve the car manufacturers and to sell cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    And to keep out icky poor people and brown people from suburban neighborhoods. Don’t forget that part. In fact that was a large part of why the car manufacturers were able to have infrastructure built this way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago (2 children)

    The nearest Starbucks to me is a little over ~3km and I live in a major metropolitan area in the US.

    My work is ~6.4km away and the Starbucks would be roughly on the way. It takes ~15 minutes for me to get to work by car. It would take ~2 hours to walk there, ~35 minutes to bike (weather permitting) and ~1 hour by bus.

    Stopping at the drive thru on my way would still take less time overall and I’d have coffee. I don’t do it because Starbucks’s coffee is trash.

    I’d love to not have to drive so much but infrastructure changes take a long time to happen so until alternative transportation is competitive I’ll be driving.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Biking for half an hour sounds fine to me if infrastructure is ok.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 days ago

    Sure, except ~3months out of the year I’d show up to work soaked in sweat and a different ~3 month period I’d be riding through accumulated snow or ice.

    They do plow but usually not the bike lanes and the paths (what few there are) aren’t ever cleaned until midday.

    Ideally I’d work from home, and I’d have a small electric car big enough for two humans and two medium dogs.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 31 points 6 days ago* (1 child)

    The average Starbucks does not have a throughput that should legally allow them to have a drive though.

    It takes like 5 minutes per car and one near me used to regularly back up on to the road and block the adjacent parking lot.

    It just doesn’t make sense to go to the start bucks drive through ever, so I don’t know who is foolish enough to form these lines.

    Notwithstanding that Starbucks is an awful corporation with either subpar coffee or comparable sugar levels to ice cream.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago

    Back before I kicked my Starbucks habit (and my car habit), I used to go to one with a drive through every day. The drive-through line was always backed up like the one in the picture. I always got my coffee quicker by parking my car, walking inside and ordering. Once I could order through the app, it was no contest. I was out the door in the same time it took drive-through people to move up 2 spots.

    Even at the height of my car dependence, I never could understand the appeal of drive-throughs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 days ago*

    One unstated thing that helps create conditions for the above:

    The people above pictured don't have robust unions and labor laws that save you from being annihilated for being late not early enough one time.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    My main takeaway here is that people drinking Starbucks are not enjoying their coffee

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 days ago*

    I live in a country where drive through isn't that common. But when a huge local e-shop introduced pickup by drive through, I decided to try it out. I tried it twice. First time it was relatively empty so I though "Hah, that's actually pretty convinient and fast". Second time it was pretty packed and I thought "Omg this must be the stupidest idea ever. What am I doing here? I'm sitting in an artificial traffic jam which I literally can't leave while employees handle a fraction of customers at once. And why exactly? So I don't leave my car?"

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    Yeah I for sure have time to sit down and drink a coffee at a cafe before work...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 days ago (10 children)

    Drive thru coffee shops should be illegal.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 days ago

    Road adjacent coffee stands without seating are probably the most common business here in vietnam, it works because its only for pedestrians, bicycles, and motorbikes, I've never seen a car stopped at one, blocking traffic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Hopefully, we'll see more and more street reclamation, with cars pushed to parking lots and downtown streets reserved for walking, bicycling, and the occasional small electric vehicle for those who need them. Local laws need to change, so we all need to vote in local elections. Voter turnout for local elections is abysmal in most cities and towns.

    We used to have places like Der Wienerschnitzel and Taco Bell with tables outside, but you still had to drive there and park. I don't know if new places are built like this anymore, probably not many. The last gasp of this sort of thing in America.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago

    USA vs the world.

    ?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago

    Does Europe have the bikini barista stands like we have out here? Those are Starbucks biggest competition.

    Well, that and unions.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago

    Surely the bottom picture should be an Italian piazza. French coffee culture is not much to write home about (they lean towards robusta rather than arabica, as that’s what their colonies grew) and the coffee you get in a pretty café in the touristy parts of Paris is going to be mediocre at best.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

    What's that area surrounding the cafe called?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago

    💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚 💚

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    In all fairness, Starbucks in Europe even in more car centric countries are a lot more like the bottom one.

    I don't think I've ever seen a drive-in to get coffee around these parts, and I've lived in several European countries.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 6 days ago

    As soon as you land.... leaving the imperial core.... it is ssoooooo much better.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 6 days ago

    Not fair. 'Murrican Super Size Drive-in versus European Coffee House. The first can never win this game.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›