Not Open Source hardware or firmware.
License is CC-NC-SA, which fails all formal definitions of Open Source.
Not Open Source hardware or firmware.
License is CC-NC-SA, which fails all formal definitions of Open Source.
Curious how 3D beat 2D by, what, 10 years?
Unless you’re printing receipts in A4 width or some shit, who the hell wants to print on roll paper
I would, when I'm printing out a D&D map. Taping pages together isn't the worst, but only needing to line up prints in one direction would be great.
But it's optional, either way. Odds are I'd have sheets in most of the time and switch to roll for that, specifically, but having the option is nice, it also lets me print smaller without wasting a whole sheet.
What is actually bad about this other than it being new to you?
Roll paper isn't ideal, proprietary cartridges are not great. I applaud the effort, but it's all the easiest parts of the printer opened while the hard parts are left to capitalism.
Roll paper in my experience hasn't been that bad, I think wanting non proprietary cartridges is not feasible at the moment and we can use ink bottles in them anyways so it doesn't seem like a big deal. Its a much better very reasonable attempt that so far nobody else has really done so its worth supporting by reason to being much better than what is available at the moment.
It’s not new. It’s old.
I guess none of you are old enough to remember fax machines. There’s a reason we got rid of roll paper, it fucking sucks
I'm not saying it is new technology I am saying new to you, who now says you have used it before.
What is actually bad about this? From my experience the curl is at worst a barely noticeable affect on the paper and is less of an issue if you go through paper quick, for the people that don't care you can use flat sheets for this printer as well.
The curl is really bad, like unusably bad, especially towards the end of the roll.
Have you ever used roll paper? In what use cases did you find it equivalent or superior to flat? Any problems with curling paper, see any paper waste from the core as it runs low?
Have you ever wrapped presents with rolled paper? Notice any issues with it? Think it would work well for a pile of documents?
Sounds like you're the one arguing from ignorance here
Yes, I never found it superior except in the case of space saving protective conveinance, just not an issue in my experience, plus it sounds like the printer offers sheets as an option anyways. I've seen curled paper with and without coming from rolls, obviously from rolls more but its never been an issue to me. As for core waste, hopefully we are recycling our paper stack coverings and rolls.
In my experience the curling has not been an issue with wrapping paper, I just wrap it in a way where its not an inconvenience, smaller sheet would be even easier to keep flat when its sitting on something flat and with stapled together in a corner anyways.
No
The hardware is pretty trivial. The cartridges, which are the most problematic part are HP. This is so underwhelming.
it's still a good start . Also aftermarket cartridges exists.
oh, and also they offer refill kits.
HP carts have the printhead included, disposable, so quality will degrade fast with refilling. Epson/brother and some Canon have permanent printheads which will last orders of magnitude longer. If the cart/printhead is still going to be propietary, epson/brother printheads, which are readily available, and which can be setup pretty easily in a CISS configuration would have been way better. The project is really bad. The fact that they use paper rolls is also dumb. Are you really going to cut every single sheet? Rolls make sense for large format printing. Epson/brother with aftermarket CISS are the way to go, especially because you can get actual Epson ink in bottles for refilling, the ones used in their ecotank line, super cheap.
it also takes normal sheet paper. but it has an integrated cutter so the rolls enable A4 or A3 (us letter or 11x17), or any other length, or continuous from the same source.
permanent printheads are not really any better from a longevity standpoint. they still do degrade and need replacement. more often than not, that replacement either doesn't exist, hasn't been manufactured since the printer was a new model, or is prohibitively expensive and/or only available from random third-parties.
the last ink tank + separate printhead setup that you could very easily get tanks and printheads for was some old canon printers from 25+ years ago. the printheads were in a removable caddy, and that caddy was sold in stores with and alongside ink tanks.
printheads also need to be used, regularly. once you go a few weeks without printing, every day that you don't increases your chance those printheads will never print again. when the printhead is in the consumable, it gets replaced far easier and automatically on a cartridge swap. yes, that is at the expense of higher cost new consumables.
we've had to bin three brothers, two hp, an epson, and a canon over the twenty years because of bad and unreplaceable printheads. coincidentally we're currently using two salvaged hp printers that use the same cartridges as this 'open' printer, use refilled consumables, and the printers are old enough they don't scream and refuse to print if the color is empty--we can use and print black only.
the problem here with this project is they don't have their own printheads and cartridges, which means some of their code was either lifted from hp printers or reverse engineered; and they rely on hp as the only source for new consumables and printheads. hp would be very hostile to this project, so i hope they fully documented their entire process of development and are ready for the inevitable lawsuit.
No more frustrating blockages like: "Cannot print in black because the yellow is empty."
I think they're trying to seduce me
Doesn't that happen because of legal requirements? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer_tracking_dots
I'm interested. Any info on how much it will cost?
In the linked survey they're talking about selling an ink kit. With that, the non-commerical license meaning nobody but them can sell spares, and them filing a patent, it's almost like they're just trying to start another printer company and just using the open source community to do advertising 🫠
Slight open-washing involved though - the license is CC-By-NC-SA, which sadly makes it incompatible with open hardware projects, and restricted from being available as a pre-assembled kit.
top 50 comments