Like another commenter said. Stalking victims already have to move to avoid their stalkers. This puts that responsibility on the offender rather than the victim. And a good relief for the victims

That seems pretty short though, surely it would mean you are not allowed to live, work or even vist the same town they live or work in.

Like if anyone I knew was to be my stalker, one of us would have to quit their job and sell their house to relocate.

That's a lot cooler than the absolutely nothing they do in the US for stalking victims.

This makes more sense since I was thinking if it's based on their gps activity from their phone, that can be spoofed lol

It only shows their location within a certain range.

And considering that this is a punishment for violating someone else's privacy I can get behind this.

...and a great security/relief for victims. I'm a vivid apologetic for privacy and security, but this seems like an acceptable thing.

People seem to be fine to be transparent and 24/7 surveilleid with their phones. Some even seem to be fine to install doorcams from US-bigtech or spy-devices that can switch on a light. Heck, they even pay for those!

This at least is a vers useful application of privacy invasion.

You know what? I'm OK with a panopticon specifically for convicted stalkers. I realize the potential for a slippery slope, but I think the risk is worth it in this one case.

Time to grab the flame thrower

Fun fact: Waluigi is famously the evil version of Luigi

South Korea gives corporate employees app to track their CEO?

I think you're joking, but in case you're not... This is just like the paradox of tolerance, everyone has a right to privacy and freedom but if they violate other's rights, society will in exchange take away theirs. We don't (generally) call imprisoned criminals "victims of kidnapping" either.