top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 12 points 2 hours ago (7 children)

Why nobody mention that Saudi arabia restarted the war by attacking an envoy returning from Khamanei funeral leading to this?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (6 children)

    You have a link?

    Iran really should assassinate the leaders of the Saudis and UAE. Patience is a virtue, just get the pieces in place, and wait.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 hour ago* (4 children)

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp9ldle3d3xo

    They are ruled by families, killinggnillik and they current leaders is useless

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 55 minutes ago (3 children)

    Just because someone else will take their place doesn't mean it's useless, that logic would make killing any leader worthless, which is not the case at all.

    The royal families of both the Saudis and the UAE are legitimate, and valuable targets for the Iranians to hit. If they don't, then it will just encourage future harm against their country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 51 minutes ago (2 children)

    You may end up with even worse more extreme leaders. I just don't see the advantages of assassination . Better focus on ruining those countries foreign and imperialist interests

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 minutes ago* (1 child)

    So Hitler shouldn't have been killed? Stalin? Mussolini? What about a little tin pot dictator sitting on oil wealth abusing their citizens and neighbors with the help of the biggest bully in the world that they stroke off?

    In truth, there is only one thing bullies understand, and losing an amount of money isn't it in this case.

    I really find your argument incredible.

    I feel like you don't know much about the dirty deeds these guys have been up to since mohhammed bin tuna here took power. They've assassinated a lot of people by the way, using american mercenary firms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 hours ago

    Well, that just can't be.

    I just saw an ai-generated ad from the Department of War that said the US Military is invincible or something.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

    All of this to cover up his pervert degeneracy. What a huge colossal waste and a big black eye for humanity.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    Interestingly I’ve seen some claims that it is possible Saudi Arabia failed to aid Tariq Saleh’s National Resistance Forces not from incompetence but rather due to not wanting to lift a finger for a proxy that had a lot of lingering UAE influence. The NRF was a lot more independent minded than the Saudi backed militias and did awkward things like cozying up to the UAE-backed STC (South Yemen separatists) after the STC basically rolled the recognized government of Yemen’s forces in much of former South Yemen… which would have been great for the NRF if things stayed that way but by like a month later the Saudis had booted out the UAE and dissolved the STC entirely.

    Compare these unfortunately blurry maps from before and after the offensive, the NRF is the one in blue in the before picture.

    Doesn’t seem like a great time for backstabbing and scheming but having a fragmented opposition has been a tremendous headache to the Saudis throughtout this war so I guess if it’s annoying enough… but Ansar Allah has like three quarters of Yemen’s population so they’re hefty (almost up there with the population of Saudi Arabia)

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 3 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 19 points 3 hours ago (1 child)

    Look like Trump is in dire straits.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago*

    I have heard people opining that he is not strait given his associations in the past with Roy Cohn, the lawyer point man of the McCarthy witch hunts and other things.

    The truth finally comes out, he's not so strait after all. I'm glad he's out of the closet, the strait closet, he came out of his nazi closet a long time ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 5 hours ago (21 children)

    More like “bad news for most of the world”

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 4 hours ago (19 children)

    If it's bad for the US, it's good for the rest of the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 4 hours ago (6 children)

    If we all suffer, it's bad. Even if you want the US to suffer, which is understandable, it's still bad if the rest of the world suffers too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 hours ago* (1 child)

    If we all suffer, it's bad.

    Truly, but Trump is not going to stop. His regime has already identified their next targets: Cuba, Panama, Greenland, Canada... We are all going to suffer - but when and how much? Outside of MAGA and Israel, nobody wanted this shit but it still happened. If the closure of the straits leads to the end of Trump's plans, it's still 'good for the rest of the world' in that it is preferable to a Trump win.

    Edit: paragraph break.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 hour ago

    I am not so sure. He doesn't have the juice to do the rest of his nationalistic military bullshit because of this conflict, which won't end. This is forever war, hotter or colder, Israel won't let it die, they will keep it going for domestic political reasons. And they have video of our politicians and business leaders fucking children, so the US is their bitch.

    They can sanction and such, I don't think they will have the support for much else.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

    Yeah it's quite a shame that we all put our eggs in your evil basket. The sooner we get what we can out of it, the better. Obviously a few will be broken but it's better than you greedy fat fucks eating all our eggs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 hours ago (10 children)
  • [–] 6 points 4 hours ago (8 children)

    Facts aren't edgy. America is literally trying to invade several countries at the moment, some of them it's longest allies.. Do you not watch the news?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (1 child)

    The blowhard president talking shit does not equal the US trying to do something.

    He talks shit for leverage because he thinks he's the best even though we all know he's a piece of fucking shit. He just said he wanted a united ireland, surely because he thinks that will force the UK to join the Iran war.

    Same with Canada but for different reasons. Not that he wouldn't do these things if he could, but he can't. And he doesn't have the juice even if we could.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

    You're missing the point while you trip over yourself in your eagerness to be edgy

    And I say this as someone who holds 'Murica beneath contempt

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago

    There is no doubt that it would be better for humanity if the USA were not fascist and were not trying to shake down the entire world. But they are, and they are. Our choices seem to be global economic devastation or literal WW3. The USA has to be stopped because Shitler ain't gonna stop himself. If Iran and the Houthis can undo Trump by squeezing the economy, i think it's better than global conflict. There will be terrible repercussions either way, but I still think WW3 would be worse. If this view seems 'edgy', it's because you are more optimistic about what is in store for the world were the USA to succeed in its current aggression against Iran.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 4 hours ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago (2 children)

    That in your efforts to shit on the US, you ignore the fact that other, more vulnerable economies will be brutally battered, whether they support the US or not

    Your childishness is ignorant to the ripples in the pond

    I want to see the power and influence of the US weakened to the point where they are the same as everyone else, but I recognise that ripping the carpet out from under them would hurt many people, and unfortunately, most of them will be the already precarious and vulnerable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago

    The brutal battering of vulnerable economies is Trump's exact intention. He started that process before he attacked Iran. You can't view this war in isolation: he is starving Cuba, robbing Venezuela, threatening the rest of NATO...

    We can't avoid the bad outcomes of American aggression; they are upon us. Stopping Trump would be the only 'good' outcome at this point - I think that is what the previous poster meant by 'good for the rest of the world.'

    It's like how amputation and chemotherapy is 'good' for a cancer patient if it saves their life.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 9 hours ago
    [–] 8 points 8 hours ago

    Iran is 2 for 2

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 9 hours ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›