top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 15 hours ago

Robots will take care of us. Meanwhile we'll be begging for death and they will keep us alive -_-

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    they're hiring caregivers like crazy in my state

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Infinite growth of human population would hit a hard ceiling on earth resources real soon.

    People not having babies is a good thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 child)

    Right on. The way the way population is right now, every time a chunk of mountain or glacier falls down, or a river floods, tens of thousands die or are displaced.

    In 1960 there were 2-3 billion people on the planet. Now it's 3x as many cars, mouths to feed, homes to heat/cool.

    In Bangladesh there are over 1 million Rohingan refugees who've been there for TEN YEARS. They can't work there, have no country to move to, have to live on $6-12 a month for food.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    It's not about infinite growth.

    Given that not everyone lives to old age, we would expect children to outnumber old people even in a zero (or slightly negative) percent growth scenario.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 15 hours ago

    look at the bright side, in about 10 years, housing will become affordable again

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 19 hours ago

    Only if there was a way to sustainably provide for an older population would that be not concerning. Otherwise, it's gonna turn convervative af everywhere pretty soon.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 1 day ago (8 children)

    Sounds like a situation that will self correct in a few decades, no?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    People think we need to keep growing the population. We're stuck on a single planet together. If we could live on the moon or Mars it would be a different story, but I think it's perfectly fine to decrease the population size back to 1980s levels, at least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    And we're talking about the elderly who don't add any productivity to the planet too.

    Sure, some minority of boomers have a good attitude and want to work for the planet and the future generations, but the reality is that a majority of them have piss poor values and are now a net drain on society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 20 hours ago* (2 children)

    Plenty of people in other age groups that are also a net drain on society. We won't get far if we don't see it as the class issue that it mostly is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 16 hours ago

    Ua the issue isnt age groups but the distribution of resources and access to political power of different classes.

    An 89 year old member of their local community centre will always be more useful to the humanity , and evem the planet , than a 29 year old billionaire lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 15 hours ago

    Other age groups don't entire half the damn economy. Boomers are a class unto themselves.

    Billionaires collectively own about 10 trillion in the US, Boomers collectively over 80 trillion.

    Just going with the US because it's the best known example. It's not very dissimilar in other western countries but the US is the worst I believe.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 12 points 1 day ago

    Karma for them being dicks.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    would it be better if the population was growing past 9bn?

    There's a stable population the ecosystem can support and I'm pretty sure 9bn is too fuckin many.

    not that I'm volunteering to free up space tho... there's a whole lot of techbro chuds who think there's way too many people, but their motivations are pretty genocidal tbh.

    honestly we're fucked in either direction, but I suspect there's a lot of reasons the population total will go down once the climate crisis starts shifting millions of people around.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›