▲ 584 ▼ I can see nothing wrong with this. (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 days ago by WanderWisley@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world 187 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 1 day ago (4 children) Infinite growth of human population would hit a hard ceiling on earth resources real soon. People not having babies is a good thing. permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Splenetic@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 day ago The 1st 40years of my life i was told I had to worry about over population, in the last 5 I've been told I now need to worry about "demographic collapse" permalink fedilink source parent [–] ADTJ@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago (1 child) It's not about infinite growth. Given that not everyone lives to old age, we would expect children to outnumber old people even in a zero (or slightly negative) percent growth scenario. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SethW@lemmy.world 1 point 1 day ago* Sure but lets allow the world population to naturally contract to 500 million or so before we start pushing for replacement numbers permalink fedilink source parent [–] myyass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago I agree. I chose not to have kids for various reasons. And my "skilled" lol trade skills will die with me. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Right on. The way the way population is right now, every time a chunk of mountain or glacier falls down, or a river floods, tens of thousands die or are displaced. In 1960 there were 2-3 billion people on the planet. Now it's 3x as many cars, mouths to feed, homes to heat/cool. In Bangladesh there are over 1 million Rohingan refugees who've been there for TEN YEARS. They can't work there, have no country to move to, have to live on $6-12 a month for food. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 1 point 23 hours ago It's actually more than 2-3x as many cars I believe, given cultural changes since 1960 as well permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Splenetic@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 day ago The 1st 40years of my life i was told I had to worry about over population, in the last 5 I've been told I now need to worry about "demographic collapse" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ADTJ@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago (1 child) It's not about infinite growth. Given that not everyone lives to old age, we would expect children to outnumber old people even in a zero (or slightly negative) percent growth scenario. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] SethW@lemmy.world 1 point 1 day ago* Sure but lets allow the world population to naturally contract to 500 million or so before we start pushing for replacement numbers permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SethW@lemmy.world 1 point 1 day ago* Sure but lets allow the world population to naturally contract to 500 million or so before we start pushing for replacement numbers permalink fedilink source parent
[–] myyass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago I agree. I chose not to have kids for various reasons. And my "skilled" lol trade skills will die with me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child) Right on. The way the way population is right now, every time a chunk of mountain or glacier falls down, or a river floods, tens of thousands die or are displaced. In 1960 there were 2-3 billion people on the planet. Now it's 3x as many cars, mouths to feed, homes to heat/cool. In Bangladesh there are over 1 million Rohingan refugees who've been there for TEN YEARS. They can't work there, have no country to move to, have to live on $6-12 a month for food. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 1 point 23 hours ago It's actually more than 2-3x as many cars I believe, given cultural changes since 1960 as well permalink fedilink source parent
[–] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 1 point 23 hours ago It's actually more than 2-3x as many cars I believe, given cultural changes since 1960 as well permalink fedilink source parent