top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 1 hour ago

Woof. I wasn't aware apple intelligence was that bad.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    Radarr, sonarr, prowlarr (with flaresolverr) and qbittorrent tied to a gluetun instance. Deploy jellyfin, and these rate increases instantly become irrelevant.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    Flaresolverr was not working all that well for me. I switched to byparr and now I'm using trawl, which seems to fail less.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago

    I'll try those as well, thanks. Flaresolverr is working for me (for the moat part anyway, lol), but it's great to know there are alternatives, so thanks for sharing. I'll try them over the weekend.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    me

    but I choose not to pay for it anymore because the product is less convenient than alternative methods

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 minutes ago*

    It all feels like a way to bleed money from working class to billionaires. Death by a thousand little cuts.

    I understand buying HBO for a month or two to watch GOT, or Apple for Ted Lasso. I don’t understand keeping it when it’s not being used. Paying for a maybe. Or 4 maybes. Streaming services often get “used” like a gym membership.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 11 hours ago

    Yawns in Stremio

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 hours ago

    I’ll seed another 2 or 3 of their shows permanently now

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 8 hours ago
    [–] 10 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

    streaming was never sustainable venture anyways. 8 episode for shows makes them forgettable.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 13 hours ago

    They are good but there is no easticity for me, the price increasing just makes me unsubscribe

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 13 hours ago

    Well one month a year maybe

  • source
  • [–] 73 points 23 hours ago (1 child)

    Damn, I’ll have to keep not subscribing!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 1 day ago (21 children)

    If Streamers were smart, they'd lock pricing and change it for new signups.

    Their problem is numbers retention. People would hesitate to cancel if their $8 plan would have to be 15/month or more to restart.

    Moving everyone up, just pushes people to cancel, and they'll be even more unlikely to come back if prices keep going up

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    i used to do the one-month binge on one service. then awhile later, do a different one.

    prices kept going up. i don't even do that any more.

    it's been over two years now without anything but what i already have in my library, or the occasional free streamer through pihole or a ubo-backed browser.

    i just don't care about new 'tv' or movies anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 hours ago

    It's been a while since I do on and off, watch stuff that interest me on service X then cancel, watch stuff on service Y then cancel, and so on. There are just too many services to be subscribed to all.

    Quality of content being the thing that keeps me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 23 hours ago

    It’s not like they don’t know what they’re doing. They studied all kinds of business strategies diurig their “International business studies” or whatever the fuck they did. The C-suite simply doesn’t care about long term retention, they want their bonuses for this year and the next. They know perfectly well they will be replaced in a few years time anyway, whether it’s because profits are not increasing as much as the shareholders want or whether the profits have gone up because of price raises, but down again because customers left.

    But in the second scenario they will get a whole lot more bonuses than in the first. So this is what consumers get: enshittification.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    It's a 2$ increase from 13$ to 15$. I feel like most people don't care and it's more of a boiled frog situation than anything else. I doubt anyone is seriously going to cancel for an extra 2$ unless they were already planning too tbh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 19 hours ago

    Also, don't most people mentally round that up anyways? $13 was already $15 as far as I was concerned, so, this is just raising it what what I basically thought I was already paying. If they raise it again though, it's going to $20 which is gonna be a tougher pill to swallow.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 28 points 21 hours ago

    In related news, piracy of AppleTV exclusives will go up by about 20%...

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 18 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] 24 points 23 hours ago

    🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

  • source
  • [+] 28 points 1 day ago* (16 children)
    load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 15 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

    Sucks. Still my favorite streaming service because of all the high quality science fiction shows and no ad tier.

    So far they haven’t cancelled any of the shows I’ve been super excited for either. It’s not like scamazon or netsux where they do a season and it’s awesome but oh, no! It isn’t #1 for a month on launch!… better cancel it.

    It’s still just a billionaire owned company though and likely to do what everyone else does eventually. Can’t wait for the next thing to come along and nuke ads again.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 7 points 20 hours ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›