top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 92 points 1 month ago (21 children)

"networking" in the social sense or in the administration/programming sense?

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] [S] 68 points 1 month ago (20 children)

    Good one 🤣 I don't think I have ever used the word to mean "managing social networks" or the likes 🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] [S] 33 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    I am so going to start to use computer networking terminology when talking about social networking from now on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 1 month ago (12 children)
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    ARP ARP ARP ARP ARP

    (like a socially acceptable seal)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 month ago

    Cicadas be like

    SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN SYN

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 61 points 1 month ago* (21 children)

    If it helps, I'm from the other side of networking and infra. You could swap the labels and make the meme accurate for me.

    In the mid 1980s I learn the BASIC programming command GOTO and fell in love for a lifetime. If you look any anything I used to write in Ruby script or today in Python you'll see my love affair with "if" "elfi" and "else" continues. My universe is nested "if" statements all the way down.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    It was fashionable at a time to avoid ifs and other imperative structures, but I tend to like them. Functional is nice and all but I like my code to be smart in the way it works, not in the way it's written. Nested ifs are readable, collapsible, and easy to make sense of at a glance, there's often nothing wrong with using them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Same here! I can put together a half-descent network in just a few hours, but even programming simple stuff on microcontrollers is a major endeavor. And the documentation is usually terrible or nonexistent. And the tutorials are usually barely able to cover basic questions. At least in the space of networking, there’s enough context clues in the UI that I can piece together the solution I need.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 43 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    In one college class we had to reimplement TCP in our own code on top of real UDP sockets. That was a fun class.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 31 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    The problem with networking is debugging it. The worst is debugging iptables and nftables. Figuring out which chain they are going to is a massive hassle. How come we don't have any graphical tools whatsoever for this work?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 24 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    I was like this 5 years ago. Networking a lot is still effort for me, but it is just another learnable skill, and it has lots of benefits (depending on your aims, I guess)

    Edit: hah, just realised this is about connecting computers, not about talking to people...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Only wizards can configure iptables for ipv4 and ipv6 port forwarding. Only wizards.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    And my boss shattering all with mean comments. Not letting me explain my code but still tearing it all down, removing all security features like checking for directory existing, connection is open aso. and then saying im not qualified for the job! Good thing i got already laid off. Bad that i'll still have to spend 3 months at this company

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    Only computer thing I still needed to call dad about as an adult.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    Oh networking is easy first you go to linkedin Then... You run

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    tcpdump looks scary but is super neat and helpful, learn it if you haven't ;)

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    I've enabled all the relevant permissions. I've disabled firewall protection. I've enabled file sharing on both sides. I've checked for connectivity to the other machine from the command line...

    Why is my shared folder still not accessible!??!

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    That's why I decided to build my first online multi-player game as an offline single-player game, and just figure out how to add the networking stuff when everything else is done- an architectural choice I definitely won't come to regret later...

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    My confidence in disk management and partition tables is made of horse hair, single strand.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    I may actually be the other way around. I'm probably better at networking than programming? Not sure, I love them both but do neither professionally.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Opposite for me lol

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I've been trying to remotely connect to a relational database of medical data. I've been smashing my head against a keyboard for days trying to get my fucking code to work. I can't even connect to their db on their Jupyter Spark cluster

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›