Your local government spent thousands of dollars on each one, so return the favor by protecting their investment!

all 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If you’re cold, they’re cold. Bring Flock cameras inside.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    This is too peaceful. Use destructive methods

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Do you really not understand that this is meant to be an easy tool to disable them, so that someone could do anything (or nothing) else to them safely?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    It's silly.

    You can just put a normal sock/cloth on them for that.

    And the flock guys will just simply remove it and you have spent money on making that fancy cover. You can straight up smash it with the same shovel/stick that it shows in the video instead of dressing it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Clean the lenses cover with acetone. You're doing a public service keeping that lenses clean and crisp.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago

    We’ve got to do what we can to protect corporate property

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    Tip: You can fill it with expanding foam right before you install it. That way it won't blow off.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    If they are cold, a little EMP burst will keep them warm the test of their lives.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Dont you tempt me to disassemble thrift store microwaves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Don't touch that if you're not a radio engineer or something similar!

    I also think a microwave oven wouldn't be the best choice...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Not a radio engineer but I did grow up with someone who worked on radar systems in the military before becoming an electrician. If Im not sure what wires to lick I know who to ask...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    From what I understand there are sensors other than cameras that you need to worry about that will still be active even with the lens covered

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    why not cut down the pole or destroy the camera, it cost them more to put one back up, also take notice of axon cameras too. it magnifies the cost if you remove the camera, and they spend more to have a person come out and put one back up. a sleeve, paint bull can simply be removed.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    as much as I like this idea, I assume it would also magnify the punishment if you get caught.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I can't think of a crime that would apply to putting this sock over a Flock camera unless there was substantial evidence linking you to some crime that was committed immediately after you did it in the coverage area.

    Obviously it's very easy to think of a crime that would apply to destroying the pole or camera.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (8 children)

    I wonder if you could design these to basically 3d print a frame and then attach cardboard , piece of fabric, or something on the front.

    to reduce the filament use and print time.

    This is kind of a big print. Good idea though.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Perhaps. But instead of a peice of fabric, maybe use a high resolution picture of someone's asshole?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Article doesn't load

  • source