Your local government spent thousands of dollars on each one, so return the favor by protecting their investment!

all 41 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 14 points 2 days ago

Tip: You can fill it with expanding foam right before you install it. That way it won't blow off.

  • source
  • [–] 64 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    If you’re cold, they’re cold. Bring Flock cameras inside.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    This is too peaceful. Use destructive methods

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    Do you really not understand that this is meant to be an easy tool to disable them, so that someone could do anything (or nothing) else to them safely?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    It's silly.

    You can just put a normal sock/cloth on them for that.

    And the flock guys will just simply remove it and you have spent money on making that fancy cover. You can straight up smash it with the same shovel/stick that it shows in the video instead of dressing it up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 days ago

    We’ve got to do what we can to protect corporate property

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    If they are cold, a little EMP burst will keep them warm the test of their lives.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Dont you tempt me to disassemble thrift store microwaves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Don't touch that if you're not a radio engineer or something similar!

    I also think a microwave oven wouldn't be the best choice...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Not a radio engineer but I did grow up with someone who worked on radar systems in the military before becoming an electrician. If Im not sure what wires to lick I know who to ask...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago* (2 children)

    why not cut down the pole or destroy the camera, it cost them more to put one back up, also take notice of axon cameras too. it magnifies the cost if you remove the camera, and they spend more to have a person come out and put one back up. a sleeve, paint bull can simply be removed.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    as much as I like this idea, I assume it would also magnify the punishment if you get caught.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    I can't think of a crime that would apply to putting this sock over a Flock camera unless there was substantial evidence linking you to some crime that was committed immediately after you did it in the coverage area.

    Obviously it's very easy to think of a crime that would apply to destroying the pole or camera.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 days ago (1 child)

    From what I understand there are sensors other than cameras that you need to worry about that will still be active even with the lens covered

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 days ago* (2 children)

    I wonder if you could design these to basically 3d print a frame and then attach cardboard , piece of fabric, or something on the front.

    to reduce the filament use and print time.

    This is kind of a big print. Good idea though.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    Perhaps. But instead of a peice of fabric, maybe use a high resolution picture of someone's asshole?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago

    Article doesn't load

  • source