top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 17 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

No, killing Art and turning your brain into sludge is just the by-product. The intention of the techno fascists is to create a permanent underclass, forced to serve the rich and live in poverty. You know, slavery for everyone except the 1%.

Just imagine a future where police and military are just drones controlled by an AI. Jobs are few and therefore badly paid. And on top of it the rich in their luxury bunkers watching us fight for the scraps and dying from climate change and malnutrition.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 child)

    Brave New World had genetically engineered humans for each wealth class, and made sure every class was happy.

    Our real-world dystopia seems to be going towards 99% of the world living in permanent misery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

    AI "works of art"... are not about genuine personal expression or interpretation channeled through art and literature by hand and DIY, but rather the production of art and literature entirely using LLMs just purely for personal convenience and gain, in either clout or money or both.

    That you have these supposed cheap "creatives" choosing NOT to DIY and set asides time to learn how to master a new art form, and instead grab an LLM box and type anything they want and the machines bring the finished product to their table... which so smacks of instant gratification.

    Fascism is not just all of its symptoms Umberto Eco talked about, but also plundering art and literature to kill off genuine expression and skill, in favor of mass-produced capricious slop.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

    It's a machine that makes your selfish, ignorant visions, the ones you wish were true, feel tangible - and that's enough for a broken person to believe. "I wish mr. trump had big sweaty muscles, oh boy..."

    People who love AI also cheat at solitaire.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 14 hours ago (1 child)

    On top of that, the elites have a problem: they hate educated people because they don't fall for the lies, but they need their "smartness". AI is their attempt to separate the knowledge and skills from the people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 6 hours ago

    i use AI, i think how it's used is very important. also, on the topic of data centers, one way or another, data centers will need to be built to scale up for any type of application. yes, i disagree with the insane water consumption, but we either halt technology as it stands now, or minimize how we use technology (i.e not relying on the cloud, web 2.0/web 3.0)

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 8 hours ago (1 child)

    Yeah, pretty much. I'm enjoying having it do some stuff for me. The people making it are absolute lunatics.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    I haven't really found a use for AI that is actually beneficial to me. The only time I run across it is via forced search engine automation, and half the time when you read the actual sources generated for it they do not match, or are not being correctly interpreted by the AI.

    From what I've seen it seems to be mainly useful for people working in tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago* (1 child)

    What industry do you work in? I've found it extremely helpful for research and finding solutions to engineering related problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I work in orthotics and prosthetics, basically I evaluate patients, build, and then fit people custom braces and fake limbs.

    It's a really small field and it is really hands on. It's hard enough for students to find actual books on the subject, let alone something that has enough available information for an AI to scrape from. I think the last time I checked my field was one of the lowest professions at risk to be affected by automation in the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

    Lefties and "anarchists" defending it is funniest shit I can observe in the wild

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 12 hours ago (1 child)

    "But intellectual property bad and muh pragmatism!"

    Firstly: 🤣🤣🤣

    Secondly: While Intellectual property isn't necessarily a good thing, its the best thing we can wield against the AI overlords. They don't want to democratize art, they want to destroy it. That's what actual pragmatism is. Also anti-IP movements hurt not big corporations, but small independent creators and developers. That disabled artist friend of yours that is now "mean" at you "for no good reason" is getting called a millionaire no matter how much they have to beg for rent money at the end of the month, while parents are continuing to look for Disney and Harry Potter slop instead of letting their kids experience art made by smaller creators. Similarly Microsoft can sustain you pirating Windows if that means Windows will remain a de-facto standard, but open source projects are also being attacked sometimes for "clinging onto evil copyright laws" or for "e-begging".

    Thirdly: Speaking of pragmatic use of AI: Why don't you use some Chinese models to hack the fash into oblivion? Why is it always some crappy AI generated agitprop, or AI slop articles talking about how AI could be used for fully automated luxury gay space communism? Taking down communication channels used by them would be a lot more pragmatic, than slowly hurting your fellow comrades just to get some clout from other comrades of yours in the name of "pragmatism"!

    Stop cooking your brain, just because techbros managed to control the narrative about anti-AI extremism. I personally know people, who would happily sacrifice a portion of the population if it means the genie will be put back quicker into the bottle, that's what real anti-AI extremism is. Extremism isn't being mean to an artist on social media, because they drew hands weirdly, or they used that "glowy"-style rendering. This is just "the real racists are anti-racists" tactic yet again, expect this time you fell for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    When you are equating something that Linus Torvalds supports with fascism, I think you might have lost the plot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 child)
    1. he doesn't "support" LLMs yet, he tolerates some uses
    2. he's also getting older, and if the past decades have shown anything is that brain rot can happen to anyone - and just because someone was based in the past, doesn't mean they are going to have a solid moral compass forever
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 child)
    1. Linux is being sponsored by AI providers. Consider this as de facto corruption.
    2. IMHO, he, and some other "vibe code bad, moderated LLM use good" developers are falling for the industry's definition of anti-AI "extremism" (simple refusal of AI usage, refusal of engaging with genAI output), and being a moderate with AI (reading the output, etc.).
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    Yea I have to agree I hate this "moderated LLM use good" stance. I have used LLMs (through private browser windows without login) to understand documentation before, or to get a usage example for a specific function, and I already feel dirty for it. I will absolutely not use that snake oil to generate code for me or even consider installing anything on my hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

    A lot of tech bros who were deeply into crypto currency scams before they latched onto AI. There was a fair bit of anti-government feeling to that lot. Naturally scammers and criminals fear regulation. Now they arguably control the government it is more about retaining their influence. It can be difficult to separate self interest and politics with the rich. I think amongst average people distrust of AI is fairly split across political divides but that might change with funded, targeted campaigns.

  • source
  • [+] -13 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    Now I remember why I left the fediverse. Good luck with your irrelevance, everyone.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›