They're not arguing that both do the samr thing. They are arguing that Side A and Side B do different things, and that the things Side A does gives the ability for Side B to do theirs. In other words Side B could never get this many points if Side A did not do theirs.

Dumb example of the opposite - if the whole of the Democratic party starts today campaigning on Meducare for All, No aid to Israel, Withdraw from Iran, impeach Trump and Co and throw them in jail, they'll win both chambers and if they follow through, this fascist wave will be halted within months. By not doing that, they allow fascism to continue killing, maiming and jailing people. This is what Side A is doing. It's not the same as B, but B cannot win without A.

No, you're absolutely right. But liberal capitalism decays into fascism or turns to it when threatened. And when liberalism has no teeth to stand up, and actively persecutes leftists more than the rising fascists, it is inherently complicit.

I want to make it clear that I think saying libs ARE fascist or as bad is absolutely stupid. But they can absolutely take part in making it possible to seize power.

The democratic party is not liberalism. They pretend to be to get votes. But where is the law that protects the right to abortion, or gay marriage. They never bothered to pass one because that would slow down and maybe even stop the GOP from doing what it is doing. They know the power swings like a pendulum, so they knowingly leave the door open. As long as they have the GOP to campaign against, they don't have to do anything substantial. Which of course would upset their corporate donors.

Responding with catchphrases and personal attacks. You sound like someone who has nothing of value to add, but can't stop themselves from posting a comment anyway.