all 41 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 163 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 82 points 2 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago* (8 children)

    This is probably relative. A lot of people (smarter and not so smart) got hooked on it because of how accessible and convient it is to just ask AI any question and get it spit an answer in seconds. However, there does seem to be a catch - after some time you feel emptiness / void because of how hollow it is. You don't seem to need to do a research anymore and critically evaluate the options.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    I'm going to always say this. Only stupid and dumb people love LLMs because it helps them feel smart and artistic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    It should be watermarked. Credit for answers should go to what generated the answers. If it’s not you, well, now it’s not so easy to be a lying sack of shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Even more! In the EU it has to be marked/identified as AI generated, if you publish it anywhere (not that it's enforced much yet, but competitors might/will sue if it's used in a company setting). I think this should be adopted world wide (although fat chance, I know)..

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    This won't work - you can always use a dumber, open model to rephrase and remove the watermark. All this does is marketing for anthropic, which I see most people are buying. Gives you a false impression you will easily be able to figure out if it's done by AI, which it is not. Liars are still gonna lie, cheaters still gonna cheat.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Sure, but they need the watermarking to later claim the copyright on the stuff that people do create in the open with their agents.

    "They would never do that!"

    "And even if they did, I would sue them, and then the justice system would..."

    "uh... uh oh"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago
    [–] 13 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Using the ai to help find the answers... ok. Using the ai to provide the answers... not ok. You still have to pull up the references or links it gives you and do the research.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Using the ai to help find the answers...

    I think this is one of many reasons why search engines became so bad so that using AI could be promoted instead. I have turned to using AI for searching because of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Then don't fucking use it you dumb lazy shit and use whatever little grey matter you have left.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    That’s the issue. It’s someone else’s fault, always. It requires a substantial amount of grey matter to accept personal responsibility, e.g. “I fucked up”. It was me, who made a mistake. When we make a mistake we downgrade to our lowest, most childish behavior, to deceive, lie and cheat, just so we are not in trouble.

    Some people never ever ever ask the question to themselves “Did my actions cause harm to another?”. Their self-importance is too great for that. The maximum I can ever hope for, with the current state of humanity is, they’ll think about it, but throw in a nice excuse. Usually “But I was stressed/busy/angry when I did it”. And that makes it okay.

    So, sadly, it requires a lot of grey matter to not use it. Mainly because of humankind’s inability to accept personal responsibility, not because a clanker contains some unobtainable information.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago*

    all of them are just admitting that they're embarrassed about using AI instead of their own brains. of course, they don't know that because claude never told them.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    i find it funny how some users tried to argue that they did most of the work. it doesnt matter if you did most of the work, everyone as students were supposed to learn to cite your sources. even if you just used claude to reorganize info, theres no reason why you would be against watermarking it unless you wanted to hide the fact you used claude.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    While I can appreciate that it's not a good thing to let AI do your work for you (not just laziness but hallucinations), I can see this is only going to encourage cheaters to use competitors to Claude.

    Like Deepseek.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Here's the support page from Anthropic. Another win from the EU, that's great! Really curious to read the technical paper about the detection.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    I'd be more concerned with how similar the method sounds to glassworm

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Would copying it in a text file not work? I mean Christ they are already skipping out on all the work they can't even copy it?

    Its like asking the kid in class to copy his homework and then handing him a pencil and paper so he can copy it for you

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Would copying it in a text file not work?

    Because doing that doesn't change the contents of the text so the "watermark" is still there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    Ahhh I understand. So it is the actual usuage of words in a specific order?

    Well paraphrasing would probably solve this problem then wouldn't it? Just paraphrase every line or paragraph saying the same thing but with different words

    I was thinking it was an embedded watermark and if you just opened a text file and typed it all out on your own then it wouldn't flag it

  • source
  • parent