all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Our goal isn't to increase the volume of AI-made assets on the marketplace. It's to give designers better tools to work faster and focus more of their time on creative work.

Source

This is not art. I do not and never will believe "AI" supports the creativity mentioned. More to that, I believe only not artists would say that nonsense. Or, sorry, a dear idiot even, who could not care less about art, human, the future at all.

Do you even realize how ineffably much an artist may imagine, consider, realize, choose while actually creating? It may be weeks, months, years... when artists developers, creates, enchants their unique miraculous creation... making it invaluable... an actual art...

These human experienced choices are immeasurably important where no "AI" should ever exist...
The effortful lovely choices, where every single choice polishes an artwork... reifying it into a perfect or an imperfectly perfect miracle...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    But won't someone think about the shareholders?? How can we allow art to not be commodified and streamlined and efficientized. That's what everyone wants! Efficient, shareholder friendly art!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment