cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/69150608

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 50 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

they don't understand humans, or computers, or business, or laws

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    What do they understand? Money!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago*

    Sometimes not even money. Microslop was left holding the bag when they jacked up the price of Gamepass and suddenly it became unaffordable for a lot of customers, and spent billions on a lemon. Sony is actively alienating their supporters, rejecting their largest market, and going all-in on a game that can't even reach five thousand daily concurrent players on Steam because they've also already spent billions on a lemon. Bad calls and sunk costs all around.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    In this thread, we each call out a stupid decision Microsoft made in the past!

    Microsoft passed on Alan Wake 2.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    But they okayed Alan Wake's American Nightmare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (1 child)

    True. Props for that, at least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I didn't mean that in a very positive way.

    I know there's a post-hoc artistique justification where Alan is a hack writer and everything in the dark place is only as good as his imagination... but a poorly made game is still a poorly made game, and trying to shove half of a Max Payne action shooter into an Alan Wake game is just asking for disappointment (just ask Amnesia fans about pigs).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago

    Bro they don't even understand software.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    And yet, they will make billions more because gamers don't care. They will keep buying their slop and using their slopware.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 child)

    Gamers do care, they are buying less of their slop and using their slop ware way less

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago

    You'd think they'd understand tech at the bare minimum. But slashing your team of highly technical people who made engines for almost 30 years sure disproves that notion.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I don't know about all that, didn't they develop Windows just to have a platform to play FreeCell Solitaire?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    No, it was a GUI designed on top of MS-DOS specifically to import Minesweeper from IBM OS/2.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago

    Windows is a 32-bit hardware extension and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    It's really something they bought together one of the strongest portfolios of gaming companies and franchises you can think of. And then they are just sitting on it, doing nothing with it, dissolving studios and firing people. They have Elder Scrolls and Fallout. Starcraft and Warcraft. Age of Empires. All dead.

  • source