The reason this is important and timely is because the messaging around these tools implicitly suggests there is an air of authority and integrity it would be impossible for them to have given that no journalists have examined and analyzed the mechanisms of these tools at any stage of their development.

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 20 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

In fairness, a lot of news organisations are run without input from adequate journalists.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Why on earth would a journalist need to have input on authentication tools??

    Surely this would be more suited for a cybersecurity expert?

    Not that I’d trust an AI-based authentication system anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    The post title and body don't make this clear, but "AI authentication tools" in this context refers to tools that verify the authenticity of journalistic image and video media to confirm they're not AI-generated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    It’s also not a commonly-used term. “AI authentication” mostly refers to using machine-learning AI as an authentication method (eg image recognition, behavior observation, etc.)

    This sounds more like just “fact checking”.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] -6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Exhibit A:) Liberal Arts education > STEM education

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Because getting a liberal arts education means you use input from people unqualified to provide that input?

    Getting your BA doesn't qualify you to do code security reviews. Most journalists get that information from people who are qualified to do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (8 children)
  • [+] [S] -11 points 2 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    A very mature response, thank you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] [S] -9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Is it really necessary for me to explain why you should know this?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [M] 11 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    Yes. It helps prevent low effort and low quality posts.

    Your post is now locked until you correct it. Just message me when you're done and I will unlock it.

    Edit: I see you fixed it as I typed this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] [S] -12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    lemmy.world is a damn trash heap facepalm

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago*

    "How come there are individuals that think on their own? I thought everything in the world was a reflection of my own consciousness. I cannot fathom a world where people don't share my thoughts and experiences."

    Indeed, very few people know journalism jargon, and authentication has vastly different meanings depending on the sphere of human knowledge one is inserted into.

    Alternatively:

    "Surely the rules don't apply to me?"

    In fact, they do.

  • source
  • parent