top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 88 points 2 months ago (10 children)

So technically they could restrict every device then even if you bought it.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

    Interesting they are saying this outloud...its almost like they are trying a strategy of determinism.

    They can go F themselves, they need to be reminded of what happens to when authority tries conformity

    image

    [https://archive.org/details/1983-30sec]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Funny u bring this ad, wasn’t Apple who also used this as well?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    They produced it...offering their product as a solution to the conformity being imposed. They are now. who they warned us against

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    “Die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain” really aught to apply to corporations more than people.

    With the leadership at the helm, new ideals, new financial goals - it’s inevitable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    What happens is that consumers roll over and take it. Especially considering if apple is doing it, it's only a matter of time before Android does as well and that eliminates all viable choices for non-techie people

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Uuuh yeah just like with any proprietary device or software in the world with a network connection and an auto update feature. That shouldnt be news to anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Its the shift of tone that bothers me, for years it was 'we would never infringe' we all suspected they may. Suddenly they are not only saying they will do it, they are even telling us its a service we should pay for. The amount of people on board with this scares me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 44 points 2 months ago*

    This seems like it would be a sizable target for ransomware. Why include an encryption program if you can have the OS do it?

    All the ransomware needs to do is make iOS think it's a payment provider.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    The article is a week old. Apple has since announced a leasing program and told The Verge the restricted mode isn't for it. They didn't say what it is for though.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    They are probably expecting a recession and people to mess up their credit but keep the phone.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I'm assuming American carriers demanded feature parity with Android where they install system apps that do exactly this.

    Doubt it would fly in the US.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Illegal here.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Duress profile code?

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago*
    load more comments
    view more: next ›