all 34 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 2 months ago (16 children)

I really like some of the bird designs but don't really like the buildings that are on the other side

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Agreed. Birds on one side, flowers on the other would be nice.

    As long as its not any with people on, should be fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    This is what Canada could have had...

    instead we have some asshole PMs and the fucking Queen of Another country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Yeah the buildings are a weird selection. I don't know most of them and they're mostly just boring skyscrapers. We've got much prettier and well-known buildings in Europe, should have used those.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    These are the buildings of the different institutions of the EU (European Parliament, European Central Bank etc.) and yes they suck

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I suspect they picked those so they wouldn't have to "pick favourites" among the different European monuments

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Yeeeee team bird let's goooooooo

    I posted this elsewhere but if anyone is curious about the different species:

    €5 - Wallcreeper

    €10 - Common kingfisher

    €20 - European bee-eater

    €50 - White stork

    €100 - Pied avocet

    €200 - Northern Gannet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    We have so many beautiful classical buildings, yet they choose the silluettes of hideous glass-and-concrete cubes that will be demolished without anyone shedding a tear.

    The birds are nice, but I do not think anyone under sixty can name them.

    All in all, I do not think the design is representing anything for a european currency.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Ok, everyone is wondering so here it goes:

    Design A - 2/10

    Design B - 7/10

    Design C - 5/10

    Design D - 6.5/10

    Design E - 6/10

    Design F - 1/10

    Design G - 4/10

    Design H - 9/10

    Design I - 7/10

    Design J - 7/10

    Design H wins.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    So we express or preference(s), but I assume the executives of the ECB or another institution will have the final say.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Sorry for all you bird watchers but I just donβ€˜t enjoy your feathered friends much. Theyβ€˜re pretty annoying most of the time for me if anything. Then again I donβ€˜t understand why they change the notes at all. They are fine as they are. They should just add more watermarks and everything while keeping the designs if you ask me.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Was this survey made by AI? Why the fuck are there so many emojis?

  • source
  • [+] -15 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Those are horrible. We need to stop putting politicians on money.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I didnt see any politicians on them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Any faces. Why are we putting faces on money?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments