43
submitted 5 hours ago by mc900ftJesus@lemy.lol to c/world@quokk.au
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Well that’s pretty much the worst headline I’ve ever read

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 hours ago

Safe pedestrian paths are non-negotiable. Even outside the city.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 16 points 2 hours ago

I mean... I don't disagree with you to an extent, but that's hardly the cause of this. These monks likely would have been safe under other circumstances. An 11 year old boy with special needs that stole his fathers truck is definitely an outlier you can't prepare for.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I strongly disagree. People walking along roads die every day. It is not safe. That exact situation may not have been foreseeable. But when you add up all of the different possible scenarios and reasons people may drive recklessly, it becomes practically inevitable that something like this will happen. If the only route people have to walk somewhere is along fast traffic, people will die. And if we refuse to develop alternatives (which are very affordable for pedestrian infrastructure) then we are choosing to kill these people by our inaction.

[-] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
43 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2238 readers
974 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS