this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
257 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59689 readers
2455 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Drivers Tend To Kill Pedestrians At Night. Thermal Imaging May Help.::Pedestrian automatic emergency braking (AEB), which may become mandatory on U.S. cars in the future, tends to not perform well in the dark.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

As much as I like the anti-car think, this really shouldn't be blamed completely on cars. Especially in the US, pedestrian infrastructure in general is lacking. This includes thinks like sidewalks, but also proper lighting at places where people could be (See the sample image of a petrol station in the article, why are there no lights there?).

Additionaly, a lot of people dress dark with no reflection surfaces whatsoever (And some ciclelysts are insane enough to go without light at night). Try wearing stuff with some build-in reflectors at night. It does not need to be an ugly big yellow patch for that. I own a backpack with nicely worked in reflectory surfaces which makes me highly visible at night.

Ofc there is also a component to the Cars and drivers here, but if thermal cameras are the first solution someone can come up with, maybe the start needs to be somewhere else.

Overall: If I can see someone jaywalking on the autobahn about 800m in front of me while going 180kph and can react to that, the cities and villages in the US should probably have something similar in lighting and overall road elsetup.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (31 children)

I know I am part of the problem, but the number of people walking around in dark colors and dark jackets at night baffles me. Bonus points if they are jaywalking because they have the right of way.

Combine that with spending any time after sunset either partially blind from super bright LEDs or fully blind from high beams and yeah. Constantly having to drive defensively and try to spot potential hazards a mile ahead in the brief window of just being partially blinded.

So I am all for some thermals I can glance at

My genuine favorite is a motorcyclist who lives out near my ex. Lights off more often than not and he has jet black leathers and helmet and bike

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bonus points if they are jaywalking because they have the right of way.

I don't know where you live, but over my way that is a dangerous, and factually wrong, assumption.

Anyone reading that, make absolutely sure it applies in your area; it doesn't everywhere.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand I tend to forget people have different life experiences.

The legality doesn't matter in the slightest. The cash settlement for suing the driver who paralyzed you isn't really that large.

Look both ways for fuck's sake

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Legality is exactly what applies when you sue. For example, in California, USA, the law is written pedestrians do not have right of way in your scenario. No, it does not mean drivers can mow them down, but pedestrians assume the risk of their actions.

I've had a lot of puahback talking about this with local people in my city who have a "pedestrians are always right" mentality, and I understand the desire to wish that's true, but it just isn't the case. There are very clear places right of way is, and is not, protecting pedestrians.

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

Judging by the heading, most people driving at night must be blind and speeding. Just keeps your eyes open and drive responsibly!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›