all 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 52 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Yes, no, maybe, I don't know, can you repeat the question?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I'm curious of what that means, but that link put me through five captchas in a row and I ran out of patience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 4 months ago

    BIG_IF_TRUE

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 4 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    May I introduce the VHDL STD library where you can set an output to "don't care":

    Wikipedia IEEE-1164

    As an embedded electronics engineer discovering VHDL was a blast and a mindfuck!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago

    DOUBLE_PLUS_UNTRUE

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I prefer the classic Bool:

    enum Bool 
    { 
        True, 
        False, 
        FileNotFound 
    };
    
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago*

    If this classic isn't linked from that Wikipedia article (I never checked) it really should be. Like the "static cling" image, evnen encyclopedias need to know when to step out of formal style. 🤭

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago
    [–] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago*

    PANTS_ON_FIRE,

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago

    While working on some client code, my coworker and I came across a case statement that said something like

    if myBoolean == TRUE
    then blah
    else if myBoolean == FALSE
    then blah blah
    else if myBoolean is null
    then blah blah blah
    

    Ever since we've always laughed at the "trinary bit".

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    megabool is_boy(const Coder *coder);

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Damn JavaScript

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    I'd have gone with "truthy" and "falsy", but I like the cut of the jib all the same

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    I'm confused as to the use of double true.

    I've been running a query adding TRUE entries to other TRUE entries, but I just get TRUE as result.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    missing this_tbh

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    This is just reinvention of Łukasiewicz multi-valued logic

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    OK and NOT_OK

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Quantum computer booleans. True/False/Everything in between.

  • source
  • [+] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source