Yes it's worth it. Even the worst, most overworked public defender has spent years of their life in school, deals with a system you've likely never interacted with on a daily basis, and usually has some level of altruism. The reason you hear about people who win by representing themselves is because it's very rare for them to not get trampled by the system
post
If you can afford a private defense attorney, you probably should. Their case load will be considerably smaller.
That said? Public Defenders tend to be some of the hardest working and most passionate people out there. You generally don't get into that unless you believe in justice (even just being a corporate lawyer who rubber stamps paperwork tends to pay significantly more) and they obviously have a LOT of experience in whatever you just did. And they tend to have a solid rapport with most judges because they see them potentially multiple times a week.
So... how about you not be a dick to the people putting the work in?
Wasn't being a dick even though my name implies it. I have been on a L and O binge for the past couple days so I asked.
bunch of genital-related posts and now this? you got in trouble, dickle?
He pissed off dave from the superhero movie. Now he needs a lawyer but all he can find is the g-spot.
Jesus do you guys and gals read each person's post history before commenting? Or am I just flavor of the week.?
No we check everyone’s.
So that's a yes on reading each person?
It's the type of questions and rapid frequency of posts every single day that has everyone digging through your history.
That depends if you want to tickle my pickle which is whickle which you won't find on any table.
If your options are a lawyer and self-representation, yeah. They're worth it.
"A person who represents themselves in court has a fool for a lawyer."
I thought the saying was "A person who represents themselves in court has a fool for a client."
At the bare minimum, with a bad lawyer, you have a chance to appeal on a mistrial. Representing yourself, you don't even have that.
Having your own lawyer is better than legal aid.
Having legal aid is better than having nobody/defending yourself. but you should verify whats said before you commit to any deals.
Legal aid isnt inherently bad, but the system definitely seeks to undermine the defense they can provide you by grossly under funding the legal aid system for the workload it has, that can result in situations where legal aid workers carry inhumanly large case loads and just arent able to give your case the time or attention it should receive.
Worth what? You aren't paying them anything (unless your state's rules are really fucked up). They're definitely better than you defending yourself.
Are they worth you putting your trust in them not to blow the case because they are fresh out of school.
Not really. It depends if you're willing to understand the legal framework and process, and adequately research case law... and have some money and time. The more you learn the easier it is to predict what legal arguments or defenses the other side will make before they even make them.
Criminal cases are obviously different but most prosecutors are already understaffed, so if you don't roll over for them and do the things an actual descent attorney would do, then a public defender isn't automatically better. A public defender will almost always try to get you to to take the very first plea offer. Rarely do you even get one that actually fights for their clients, especially when there is an injustice.
But you must commit the time and it is exhausting mentally. I'd almost always rather pay for an attorney, but there have been times when the attorneys said no, and I knew the attorneys were wrong. In both instances I won major cases by myself and even had opposing counsel try to recruit me at their firm afterwards saying they'd pay for me to get a law degree.
all 28 comments