99
Delaware Delenda Est (thelemmy.club)
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Strayce@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 hour ago

Cool. Can they also drink and get married?

[-] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 2 points 29 minutes ago

Libertarians prowling about and asking what the age of consent is for corporate entities

[-] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 10 points 3 hours ago

"But remember, taxing porky is a bad bad bad anti-freedom thing for meanie poos! Porky can take your vote because he's soooo special, but him paying taxes? How could you be so authoritarian?"

[-] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 6 points 3 hours ago

Wow. Thats one of the singular worst things I've ever heard outside of direct humanitarian atrocities.

Thats cool. Love it here. ๐Ÿ™‚

[-] elpaso@hexbear.net 25 points 5 hours ago

3/5ths compromise but instead of slaveowners counting slaves it's billionaires counting shell companies.

[-] VILenin@hexbear.net 3 points 1 hour ago

Shell companies are the default voting unit and humans can only be considered 3/5ths of a shell company at most

[-] znonymous@hexbear.net 36 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Does this mean that a billionaire can just create a few hundred thousand "entities" that can all vote? Registering that many corporations is only a couple hundred bucks, right?

A few hundred thousand votes in the right district seems like it means any election can be bought directly.

[-] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 19 points 6 hours ago

I want to reiterate that Metropolis is canonically in Delaware, which means Lex Luthor could create a million shell companies to vote to outlaw Superman in the state.

Also Gotham is in South NJ, within view of Metropolis.

[-] Chulk@lemmy.ml 28 points 7 hours ago

So what happens when this goes to the Supreme Court? Citizens United v2.0?

[-] Posadas@hexbear.net 40 points 7 hours ago

They declare that only corporations are people and legalize serfdom.

[-] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 17 points 6 hours ago

Fun (?) fact: Ontario allows property owners and their spouses to vote in municipal elections wherever they own property. But they need to own it personally, not via a corporation or trust.

https://www.ontario.ca/document/2026-voters-guide-ontario-municipal-council-and-school-board-elections/eligibility-vote

[-] Kaputnik@hexbear.net 11 points 6 hours ago

Municipal politics in Canada in general are pretty wack because they aren't constitutionally defined as a level of government. Most cities don't even really have councillors with a real platform, they just kinda vote on what the vibes of the councillor are outside of the big three of Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver.

[-] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 9 points 6 hours ago

Hard to have a platform if the mayor can do whatever they want ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ

[-] Mindfury@hexbear.net 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I'm pretty sure this dogshit has cropped up a little in australia and must be frustrated wherever possible. ofc it's very limited but it shouldn't happen at all.

while local councils (effectively 'municipalities' elsewhere) are really the least effective/powerful in australia - we're very top-down in terms of 'federal->state->council' rights and responsibilities, especially moreso down south - Melbourne City Council allows the following with the justification that they administer the 'Central Business District' which mostly comprises of commercial property:

Who can enrol to vote?
If you are over 18, you can enrol to vote in the Melbourne City Council elections if you:

  • rent a rateable property in the City of Melbourne โ€“ you need to have lived there for a month or more. You do not need to be an Australian citizen
  • own a rateable property in the City of Melbourne and live in it
  • own a rateable property in the City of Melbourne and live somewhere else in Australia
  • are a business owner, who owns or leases a commercial property in the city. You could be sharing the property with another business
  • represent a company or corporation that owns or leases a rateable property* in the city.

*Rateable property means an occupancy which is capable of being separately valued under section 13DC of the Valuation of Land Act 1960 but is not a single parking space, mooring location or storage unit.

while i could go either way on citizenship/permanent resident requirements for voting in this tier of elections, they explicitly give fucking landlords and representatives of corporations votes. I also remember some bullshit about business votes possibly counting for double a regular vote or something, it makes me want to scream

this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
99 points (100.0% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14375 readers
705 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS