all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 80 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Regardless of topic, I can relate to the need to look something up in the middle of the night for peace of mind.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    i looked up the number of deaths during the napoleonic wars like yesterday

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    eh idk, i had difficulty finding exact numbers. apparently the napoleonic wars did have wide consequences but not so much because of the number of people that died in them but because they basically pushed very severely the modernization of all states in europe, which then caused a whole lot of things to happen rather quickly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    This isn't really a mystery. We know the fossil record is incomplete, something like 99% of species are almost certainly not represented in the fossil record and what is present will massively be biased towards marine life.

    Plants don't fossilize particularly well anyways so it's not surprising that we don't have records for these organisms. The fact that we have records for the existence of ferns at all is probably evidence of them suddenly becoming massively prolific (I wonder if some major environmental change occurred around that time ☄️) rather than them springing out a thin air.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    They were dropped off by aliens. The very same ones who returned millions of years later to build us pyramids. It’s a very philanthropic extra-terrestrial community

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 3 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I'm giving her all she's got Captain!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Stupid spaceship, can't even reach warp 11 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Do you want to be transformed into a large alien salamander?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    *and have hot large alien salamander sex with your captain?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (18 children)

    what? Sorry, what does it mean? I cheated my way trough computer science - archeology / biology are not my expertise.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    I think it means we don't know what the ancestors of those plants are/what they evolved from. They just kinda showed up in the fossil record.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    ehh, modern biology doesn't construct evolutionary history from fossil records, but from genetic similarities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    It's impossible to compare genetics from fossils and we can't study ancient long dead species besides fossil records for the most part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    yeah that's not what i meant. phylogenetic trees are constructed by considering the genetics of recent (living) species, not from fossils.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Relatively few lifeforms end up fossilizing and then some of those fossils later get eroded. The percentage that make it to the present is low.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    I'm no paleontologist but it seems like our total knowledge of certain eras comes from a few river banks collapsing on whatever lived there. That's not going to be a great representation of all life at that time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    It means our knowledge of their ancestry cuts off at that point. Anything else is speculation without additional information.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    That is exactly what the comic says but its not true, fossil records for ferns go back to the devonian several 100 million years before the Cretaceous

    https://www.ontariobeneathourfeet.com/dinosaur-salad-ancient-extant-ferns

    https://www.amerfernsoc.org/about-ferns

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Imagine you are trying to infer the structure of a tree by only know the positions of its leaves. Now imagine doing the same, but only 1/100 of the leaves are above ground.

    It's only a small fraction living organisms which remain alive today. Most species and families which have ever been are extinct. And most are so old we could never do DNA work on them. Among the living, we can do some good DNA work and that's made a huge difference. But then go back far enough and there are just massive nonconformities.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    “I can’t get… no… sleeeeep…”

    techno music

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Paleobotany my beloved

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I usually schedule it to tommorrow and the forget it.

  • source