you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 40 points 4 months ago (10 children)

I think it means we don't know what the ancestors of those plants are/what they evolved from. They just kinda showed up in the fossil record.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    ehh, modern biology doesn't construct evolutionary history from fossil records, but from genetic similarities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    It's impossible to compare genetics from fossils and we can't study ancient long dead species besides fossil records for the most part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    yeah that's not what i meant. phylogenetic trees are constructed by considering the genetics of recent (living) species, not from fossils.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Relatively few lifeforms end up fossilizing and then some of those fossils later get eroded. The percentage that make it to the present is low.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    I'm no paleontologist but it seems like our total knowledge of certain eras comes from a few river banks collapsing on whatever lived there. That's not going to be a great representation of all life at that time.

  • source
  • parent