843

For years, Clarence Thomas has been showered with gifts. Flights on a billionaire’s private jet, lavish vacations cruising on his superyacht, summer stays at his Adirondacks compound, tuition for a child Thomas was raising, a quarter-million-dollar motorhome a wealthy friend paid for.

Those gifts were income, and income belongs on a tax return. Thomas treated them as nothing, and no public record shows he ever reported a dollar of it. Under Virginia law, leaving income that size off a return, if it was done to cheat the state, is a felony. The evidence is already public, and he could be charged on Monday.

Virginia law makes it a felony to file a state income tax return with a false statement on it, made with intent to defraud the Commonwealth. The statute is Virginia Code section 58.1-348, it carries up to five years in prison per count, and the clock has not run out on the returns Thomas filed for tax years 2020 through 2024. That is the whole case, and unlike everything else, it is a case a county prosecutor in Virginia has the plain authority to bring.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 228 points 1 week ago

I'll believe it when I see it.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 72 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah that's what I told everyone when Trump was convicted of 34 felony charges :(

If it comes down to it, Trump will just pardon him as "a victim of the radical left".

[-] qprimed@lemmy.ml 58 points 1 week ago

this looks like a state charge. trump (theoretically) has no control over state pardons.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Yes but there won’t be any charges. This article is only saying that the state could charge him, if it decided to.

[-] EpeeGnome@feddit.online 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The good news it's the state of Virginia, not the federal government, that could file these charges, so the president would have no ability to pardon it. The bad news is that it's purely hypothetical. We can all see the crime was committed, but that doesn't mean a Virginia prosecutor will actually go through with pursuing the case on any particular day.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Watch thomas sue, let it get all the way to the SCROTUS and Thomas doesn't recuse himself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 66 points 1 week ago

The worst part of this is that even if he is convicted and removed from the judiciary, Trump gets to pick his replacement, so it will not only not fix anything but will very likely make it worse.

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

The least reliable members of the facist block of SCOTUS are those appointed by Mr. Trump.

He's really, really bad at the job.

[-] qprimed@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

thats a pretty astute observation. still, narrowly missing a "state-level charlie kirk" because the fascists are just fucking bad at the job is not the type of comfort I hope for.

[-] auntieclokwise@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Not really a new thing for fascists. Hitler screwed the German army so hard with dumb projects that had no chance of going anywhere, poor decision making, poor management of the government, etc. For example, the V-2 program is widely seen as a net loss for Germany - it cost too much, consumed too many resources, and never proved to do meaningful damage. Then there's Germany's obsession with giant tanks that were never going to be practical, even if they somehow made them reliable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

I mean the trial will take time and if Democrats get to control Congress after midterms they could just not confirm any of Trump's picks. Who am I joking, the Democrats would never.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

I've got to say it. This is a case the Biden DOJ could have brought too. And Obama. The Democrats have got to stop playing games. They should have immediately changed it up when Obama was denied justice picks.

[-] bmebenji@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 week ago

I’m looking forward to the Supreme Court ruling that a sitting Supreme Court member has “operational immunity” and effectively ruling that anyone on the Supreme Court can break the law as much as they want until their fucking life ~~sentence~~ term is up

[-] Tronn4@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

And also all supreme court members can't be tax audited. And the creation of a Supreme Slush Fund

[-] magi093@l.tta.wtf 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To be clear (because it isn't totally obvious from the title and text submitted on Lemmy), this article is a call to action, not reporting on a filing that's actually happened or rumored to be in progress or anything like that:

So why Monday? Because there is nothing special about Monday. It is the next day the courthouse opens, the next day a prosecutor could walk this to a grand jury, the same as they could have on any working day for the last several years. For anyone else, this case would already be filed.

[...]

Three officials can move on this, and they can each do something different, so we ask each one for what they actually have the power to do. [...] Here is where to reach them, by phone or by email.

He could be charged Monday. Or Tuesday. Or he could've been charged last Monday. There's three people in Virginia who have the power to make that happen, you should go call and email them.

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago

Surely it's better to wait until trump is no longer president, otherwise if this forces Thomas to resign trump gets yet another supreme court pick who will be as young as possible to guarantee the court doesn't swing back around for another 40 years

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Etterra@discuss.online 30 points 1 week ago

Nothing will come of it but it at least sounds funny.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] xSikes@feddit.online 30 points 1 week ago

Throw all the books at him

[-] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Absolutely nothing will happen.

Best case scenario, the stress pushes a clot into his brain.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah, and then the cons put an extremely right wing hack that's also a zygote onto the court.

[-] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 22 points 1 week ago

And this is why we are all poor, this is why billionaires keep stealing from us, because of greedy no backbone failures like him.

[-] BilSabab@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

how is this guy still employed? honest question - dude has litany of corruption accusations going back decades and he's still holding a position? How does that work?

I have been hearing about this guys corruption and scandals since the early 90s.

Hes living proof of why lifetime Supreme Court appointments should not exist

[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Monday is a federal holiday.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago

Calling it now, nothing will come of this.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 week ago
[-] timochka@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

It's the US - I think we all know the answer.

That country needs to (for so many reasons) drop "In God We Trust" as an official motto - "Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda" seems more apposite.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 17 points 1 week ago

Isn't Monday a Federal Holiday? The courts will be closed.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I'm jaded and cynical. Can you blame me?

[-] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago
[-] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago

That would be lovely. Nothing will come of it, of course, and he'll just scream “racism!!” but it would still be nice.

Wait—Monday's a holiday. Nothing’s going to happen on Monday.

[-] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Jesus Christ.

There's a difference between possible and probable. This headline is extremely misleading. It might as well say Clarence Thomas could have monkeys fly out of his butt on Monday.

Is it possible? Yes.

Is it probable? No.

I understand this is "a call to action" but the headline is disingenuous.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That asshole really needs to fall for all the corruption he has been part of.
But it's doubtful it will ever happen.
Americans simply don't do enough against corruption, no matter how bad and no matter how obvious.

Hey y'all, RTFA. It is not saying what you think it is saying. The last several paragraphs twist things on thier head.

[-] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

He will not be

[-] green_goglin 7 points 1 week ago

lol we all know nothing is going to fucking happen

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Please send this slimeball to jail

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Aaannnnddd nothing will come of it because he is a boot licker for this administration.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

These are state crimes. The only way Trump can affect this case is if he sends in the National Guard to protect Thomas from being arrested.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

BS.

  • Monday is a holiday
  • everything said here has been true for years. Where are the charges?

I understand the desire for justice, I agree this case is egregious, and the proof does seem out in the open, but wishing doesn’t make it so

Memorial Day? Definitely not but maybe Tuesday

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Time to put him behind bars.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
843 points (98.3% liked)

politics

29962 readers
2092 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS