all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 69 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Meanwhile on Lemmy:

No one under 18 years of age or under the regulated minimum age defined by your local law (whichever is higher), is allowed to use or access the website.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    On my instance nobody younger than the admin is allowed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    That actually varies by instance, it's been an issue because the lead mod of several tiny communities is under 18 and had to move their communities to an instance they're actually allowed to be on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Linux is not for the eyes of the younger, for its enchanting presense can be overwhelming and turn you into a programming catboy

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I wasn't allowed to play GTA when I was a kid either but well ...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Back when I was young teenager, the game Mortal Kombat 2 was not only banned for kids, but also for adults here in Germany. I still played it.

    Life finds a way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    "By using this site"

    Lmao get fucked my HTTP requests are not a signature to your terms

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago* (7 children)

    Nobody's enforcing it so who gives a shit?

    Without caring to read the replies to that mail, pretty sure it's because the forum feature can be seen as a social network and they just don't want to deal with getting guardian's approval and similar BS some laws around the world may require. openSUSE is a corporate-led distribution after all. They have to abide by different rules than some dude remixing Ubuntu in his bedroom.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

    Nobody's enforcing it so who gives a shit?

    Because once people accept age-gating for any and all websites, enforcement (i.e. age verification) becomes a much easier sell to the average person who doesn't care about their privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Then stop interacting with any community / user on programming.dev RIGHT NOW!

    1.3. You are at least 16 years old and over the regulated minimum age defined by your local law to access our services.

    https://legal.programming.dev/docs/terms-of-service/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Then stop interacting with any community / user on sopuli.xyz RIGHT NOW!

    Our site, products and services are all directed to people who are at least 16 years old. If you are under the age of 16, per the requirements of the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) do not use this site.

    https://sopuli.xyz/legal

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    That hypothetical doesn't seem to have happened in reality, because these terms have been standard in almost all TOSs for decades and yet age verification is not suddenly an easy sell.

    Do you not read the terms of service before creating an account on social media?!?!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago

    I'm sure exactly zero kids have read the TOS and left the site. There isn't so much as a pop-up that attempts to enforce it.

    As others have already mentioned, most Lemmy instances have this exact term in their TOS (which you read, right?)

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    You know what they say keep it quiet keep it movin' (stranger danger etc.)

    Grew up in a time where no one gave a shit. Didn't tell people my age online. Nothing ever happened.

    CYA (cover your ) terms without verification is ok by me. Responsibility should be on parent.

  • source