The European Commission preliminarily found Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX and XVideos in breach of the Digital Services Act (DSA) for failing to protect minors from being exposed to pornographic content on their services.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 161 points 5 months ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 113 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    And what do you think happens when big platforms have to introduce age verification? People will just go to smaller unregulated sites which may inadvertently be worse because of malware risks and unregulated content. You just can't take the porn out of the internet, people always find a way

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 83 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Won't someone think of the children

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 76 points 5 months ago
    [–] 70 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    And so it begins. How long until Lemmy will be forced to verify age?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    I'll run VPN through Djibouti for everything once that happens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    I went to early elementary school with a girl from Djibouti. I went home to look up Djibouti in an ancient encyclopedia program. Probably one of the earlier Microsoft Encarta versions, and earned that Djibouti has the best national anthem.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 66 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    And that's how it begins. Soon they'll start asking everyone to provide ID to access the internet.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 62 points 5 months ago (11 children)

    Minors accessing porn on their own is not a real problem, and hurts no one.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 50 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Hey EU (and all other regulatory agencies interested in “protecting the children”), how about you provide information to parents on how they can setup their own blocking tools, like DNS. You can do this for free, today, right now and actually get the results you supposedly want.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 50 points 5 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)
    load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 49 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    Despite stating in their Terms of Services that their services are for adults only, all four platforms allow minors to access their platforms by a simple click confirming they are over 18.

    That's weird, I wonder why they did that? They've blocked traffic entirely from age-gated states. But in the EU they're taking a stand of some sort?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 43 points 5 months ago

    They did the best they should have to do.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 5 months ago

    The real crime here is while the EU is trying every angle to error your privacy, that time is not being spent on real issues. You are being sold out by the very people put into positions of power to serve you. If the data supported their goals, I would be there with them, but the data is very clear on the matter and the it indicates we are in for big issues with all these IDs being stored by centralized targets.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    porn should be behind age of consent not behind 18; being allowed to fuck someone but not see media of sexual things is total bullshit

    and not as a law. this is not the government's job at all. prohibition doesn't work. the only solution is proper sex ed

    just because it's harmful to the self (according to dubious claims) doesn't mean that people should not have this freedom. people's freedom is more important than prevention of them harming themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago

    Whoever's currently responsible for the kid should be responsible for watching them and keeping them out of shit they shouldn't be getting into. Expecting everyone else to put up with this privacy invading shit is fucking stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    First they came for the porn...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    ...and no one gave a fuck

    Then they came for influencers ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 5 months ago (19 children)

    So yeah tor doesnt require a ID... So have fun I suppose? And be careful

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 5 months ago (18 children)

    And then it pushes people into darker areas. I just sw a post about a horrible rape ring and it hosted videos on sites that I saw on 4chan over the years.

    How about parents be parents and monitor kids.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (13 children)

    For real. This is like saying all underage drinking is the alcohol companies fault rather than the parents that leave their alcohol easily accessible to their kids, basically providing it for them. Underage kids say 16 or under should absolutely not have unmonitored access to the internet, and that is solely on the parents to enforce. You don't have to buy your kid a smart phone or tablet or computer. When you do your providing then access to the internet and hoping they make the right call.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago

    Didn't know about Stripchat. Sooo … thanks, EU?

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    What a second. Pornhub is in US. This is like UK trying to force 4chan into age verification

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    If kids are willfully seeking porn, then it ain't anybody's business to stop them. Exploring and enjoying your sexuality is part of growing up, and "moral" whackjobs shouldn't get to decide how people grow up.

    Protecting the kids should be about providing useful information, contraception, and official aid against predators.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Why do children have to ruin everything?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    There are no minors holding EU office, anything being done in the name of "kid-friendliness" is actually advertiser-friendly, minors are a convenient scapegoat with basically no political power who can be leveraged to curtail everyone's rights

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago

    I’m reading and odd headline about the EU and wonder if it’s the Commission again. Then I‘m reading EU Commission and think lobbyist groups, foreign think tanks and the filthy rich.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    That's not how the internet works.

    The onus is on the users. The parents are the ones who have to figure out a way to ensure what their kid's devices can access, or that they are educated enough not to seek it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 12 points 5 months ago*

    I am once again asking why a non-European website (pornhub) should have to care.

    If you want to censor stuff so bad, then hop to it. Why are you asking people outside your borders censor themselves?

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    Let's do a hot take though - zoomers or whatever newer gen is are so out of natural touch and wired into their doom scroll that they won't even bother looking for porn.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›