685
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by NomNom@feddit.uk to c/til@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Slashme@lemmy.world 59 points 6 days ago

Holy shit, that article is tedious to read. Nowadays "good writing" seems to mean "jump around in the timeline a lot and write a whole lot of irrelevant backstory".

[-] thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

The writer needs AI to pad the words in an article, and the reader needs AI to sum up an article quickly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 17 points 6 days ago

The Tarantino Method, they call it.

[-] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Oh good, it wasn't just me then. Admittedly I'm ADHD but usually I have no problem reading long form articles if they're well written, but this shit was just… uh… shit

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Should America be reformed, there should be a rule about pardons: A governor initiates the pardon, then 51% of all participating voters has to reject the pardon to prevent it. Further, the pardon's effect is restricted to their state. A presidential pardon is national, but again requires 51% of participating voters to deny it.

This form of cancelling vote allows decision makers to have reasonable autonomy, but if voters vote against it, the pardon is easily denied by the public. The voter pool is whoever sends in a vote of yay or nay. So if there are people dedicated to preventing a leader from making bad pardons, they can get out the word and swell the pool of rejection votes.


IMO, we should have open-sourced digital and standardized direct voting on all matters, with physical laminated printouts for verification against the digital votes. Everyone attached to a city can vote there, those who live in a state can vote on state matters, and occupants of the nation can do the same on that level. No gender or qualifications, beyond having a residence within the nation, and having citizenship - regardless of how it was obtained.

[-] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

It seems a LOT easier to just take away pardons entirely. They are abused more often than not.

Yeah, it sucks for innocent folks. But their sentence can still be commuted.

The fact we still have the death penalty that's still unjustly applied across race is every reason pardon powers should stay in effect. Controls need to be in place for certain for them but getting rid of them I feel is a slippery slope into further punishment incarceration for minor infractions, especially POC.

[-] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Seems to me that this is a great argument for getting rid of the death penalty. It's a win-win. No more pardons for the guilty, no more executions for the innocent.

[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Pardon powers have been in effect while this was unjustly applied.

I understand the impulse, but they frankly don't contribute meaningfully to the actual criminal justice system.

After Richard Nixons pardon, It should have been unequivocally. Fucking. Over.

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Part of an overhauled America, would likely entail a redoing of all kinds of things. Including a standardization of criminal codes - getting rid of legacy criminal qualifications in every state, and starting fresh from a clean sheet design. Over time I expect that sort of thing to eventually devolve with the introduction of new codes, but we can enshrine things.

For example, requiring attorneys to switch between defense and offensive roles, allowing both sides to pick their representatives, make it so that all legal representation is free, standardize records of lawyers for people to review, ensure juries are split in half, each receiving an explanation of the defense or offense at the same time, ect.

To sum up: make it harder to game the legal system, and give the prosecution and defense equal standing. Right now, prosecutors get too many advantages.

Probably a topic best for the Legal Eagle team to roundtable and do some game theory on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

with physical laminated printouts for verification against the digital votes

How do you keep your vote secret then?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[-] zemo@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Awful article, its truly hard to read. Why is the entire backstory of the victim relevant? We shouldn't need to be told to have empathy for an innocent victim, that should be automatic. The driver deserves a sentence for second degree murder.

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

I lost track and had to abandon reading it. Meandering rambling.

[-] bagsy@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago

We can not allow 2 justice systems to exit. If the law isnt equal for all, then what is it? What is the point?

The government wants our taxes, but refuses to represent us or protect us. Thats not what i signed up for. Thats not american. Thats not worth defending.

[-] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

To go further, it IS worthy of contempt, hatred, and VIOLENCE DESTRUCTION.

OPPRESSION MUST BE MET WITH AN EQUAL OR GREATER REACTION. EVERY TIME.

[-] minorkeys@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Oppression and control. Protection of the wealthy from the poor.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

you already have 2 systems… it's time to act to destroy them and fix it

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

American justice. Best justice money can buy.

[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 24 points 6 days ago

Here is another case of a connected rich man killing a poor innocent, and going scot free. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FmbwU3J-2kk

Bob Dylan - The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll 

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 18 points 6 days ago

Vigilante justice. It doesn’t always work out. Occasionally it does. Just saying.

[-] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Vigilante justice. Chomping at the bit to dole out a death sentence based on a 34 word post title on a website.

[-] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago

I didn’t say that. You said that. What the hell is up with the death sentence talk?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Sometimes the law makes the wrong decision and at those times, something can be done to correct that. That's all I'm saying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 11 points 6 days ago

I nominate this bastard as a potential resident of Luigi's mansion.

[-] bufalo1973@piefed.social 3 points 4 days ago

And then they'll ask why people see Luigi as a hero.

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 7 points 6 days ago

Testing the new lawlesness apparently.

[-] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago

Does the rich want a lynching based order?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
685 points (97.6% liked)

Today I Learned

28813 readers
1013 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS