top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 98 points 2 years ago (5 children)

It's absolutely terrible, if it wasn't for the free games no one would use it at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Free games were a great way to "get us there" but not a great way to monetize us. They haven't come up with that. I've bought exactly 3 games on Epic, two that I price-camped because they were too expensive. The free games didn't influence my decision.

    The third was a free game where they had the best price around on a "more complete edition". (Pathfinder Kingmaker). I feel like they could've done more of that if they wanted to monetize the free.

    But what all these game stores need is to change the rules. GoG tried by making their Galaxy app pretty good at importing others' apps. I feel like someone (Epic? lol) could go all-in supporting and helping maintain an open-source game management app like Playnite, so people who use that app would put Epic on the same tier as Steam, and then Epic would just have to win on an even playing field.

    And if Epic provided a "find your price in all services" extension to an app like Playnite, and then just made sure to be $1 cheaper on everything, they'd dominate the market.

    Or they could just continue doing what they're doing and keep losing money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    The user interface looks and feels like it was designed by the 17-year-old "gifted" nephew of the CTO as a gig to make a little money before going to Uni.

    Blowing up millions per years because you couldn't be arsed to hire a senior UX/UI expert and a proper experience team to make that website is the very definition of stupid.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    For those of you that don't play rocket league, it is a prime example of just how badly epic is willing to fuck up a game for a dollar. Literally Mr. Crabs.

    This December 5th, they are removing player to player trading from RL. Why would they alienate such a core faction of their player base?

    Fortnite.

    Apparently, that game is getting a racing mode and they want you to be able to drive your rocket league car in Fortnite. Apparently, the only possible way to make this happen is to eliminate player trading.

    Now, every single high value item like alpha boost ($5-7k) or a white hate ($???k) is worthless. Now, if there is a particular item you really want, you can wait for rng to drop it, or nrg for it to show up in the shop where you can expect to pay a minimum of x10 credit it would have cost you on the trading market.

    I expect a class action lawsuit. They locked player to player trading behind a purchase of credits. They made hundreds of thousands of players pay for a feature and are now removing that feature in a blindly idiotic money grab.

    FUCK EPIC GAMES.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I mean they made the app using a fucking game engine. Who knows what stupid idea they will come up with next.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    Makes me think of the old saying (so applicable in IT, and I say this as also a mea culpa for what I do sometimes) that "When all you have is a big bloody hammer, everything looks like a nail"

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [–] 24 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Id be more inclined to use the launcher if it was more like steams. The epic launcher feels more like a store than a library of my games.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Steam has been improved over decades, epic has to play catch-up

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yes and no.

    It's not like Epic had to start where Steam started.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago*

    It didn't but creating a new Steam costs money and it's better to release a working product that doesn't have all the features you want it to have to start bringing in money while continuing to update it instead of waiting even longer only to have even more features to troubleshoot when the product releases while still bringing in the same amount of money.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago*

    If you're on a VPN, it reloads about every minute, meaning you can't even scroll through your game library, or read the summary or watch a video for a game you're considering buying. Their shoddy, clueless coding literally makes it impossible to shop in their store without disconnecting from my VPN, which is not happening.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    Still not usable

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Don’t they hook telemetry into their downloads? Maybe like… stop doing that? Why would anyone purchase an objectively worse product for the same price?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    To me, Epic Games store is nothing. They have no official Linux support while Steam does. And also games purchased on Steam works on Steam Deck too!

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    Good! Let's keep it that way

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Objectively, for such a third party store, their prices are just too expensively normal. If they dropped them instead of giving and paying for free copies of games to people who've shat on their store, they'd probably be in a better position.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago
    [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    The only thing I use EGS for is Unreal, having the marketplace built in is pretty nice, but how Unity does it is still better.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›