all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 60 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 54 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    This from the files?

    Edit: had never seen the man

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Accountability, I wonder if the Americans know about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    They didn't care about the rapes. They let that shit slide. This is for passing official documents to Epstein. Too bad Virginia Guiffre didn't get to see him arrested.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I'm hoping that it will escalate and he will end up charged for Virginia's abuse as well as any others he raped.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I just hope Virginia realized, at some point in her life, how many people believed her. There is no justice that will undo what was done, but we will get some measure of justice for her and all the other victims if we have to turn the whole world upside to do it (and it looks like we probably will)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago

    Happy birthday haha

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    Keep going. I'm almost there.

    Sure, it took public release of documents they've known about for a decade to do anything about it. But at least THEY are doing something to someone in power.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    PLEASE Andrew! As a Republican trying to Protect the Children I URGE you to Flee to the US so you can live PEACEFULLY! We DONT Care if you Raped Children on Child Raping Island with Mr Child Raping Leader! We ONLY Care about Protecting Children!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    The ArtistPaedo Formerly Known As Prince..Andrew. Arrested? Nice.

    Time will tell if anything comes of it but, HAHA, his legacy and memory is ruined completely and forever. All because he wanted to fuck kiddies, what a total twat.

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
    [+] -6 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I feel like it's best form to include the full name of a suspect in the title of an article. I'm currently working with a dude named Andrew and this was just bizarre

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Until he was no longer prince, that was his full name. Royals never adopted surnames.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (3 children)

    What a weird system, rich people man. Also the article says "mountbatten -windsor" that's a surname isn't it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    It's historical. Surnames in Europe weren't a uniform thing until the early 1800s under Napoleon.

    An epithet like "of the house of Windsor" is approximately the same thing, and sure enough if they leave the royalty they usually take that as their surname (see also Harry, Prince of Wales, going as Harry Wales when he was in the military).

    The point of a surname is to disambiguate between people (e.g. Mark, Jacob's son, or John, the smith). For a prince, if you say Harry you already know which one they're talking about, so they never needed to truly adopt surnames.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    Tell that to Hatshepsut and the whole string of goddamn Thutmoses she had to put up with. (Yeah they had numbers but when you yell "Thutmose!" you don't really want all of them.)

    And applying that to royals in general, if they're so unique they should be more creative with the names, dontcha think? So many Henrys and Louis

  • source
  • parent