Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Guys u should try out Facegpt ai it's really good

  • source
  • [–] 413 points 6 months ago* (16 children)

    According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

    Is Google seriously arguing that the money these nations save can't be added to their GDPs?
    That's what it sounds like. Or am I confused?

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 262 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness.

    Just what I'd expect a monopoly to say.

    Fuck you. Alphabet.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 146 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    When companies like Google, Microsoft, etc. are starting to squirm and whimper. You know you are on the right path. So I take this as a sign that the EU is heading in the right direction.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 133 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    "Drug dealer criticizes drug user's plan to quit."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 130 points 6 months ago (41 children)

    Of course Google hates open-source. They can't compete with it. Same shit with Microsoft: people are just afraid of trying Linux, but those who do, rarely look back at Windows.

  • source
  • hideshow 41 child comments
  • load more comments (41 replies)
    [–] 99 points 6 months ago (4 children)
    1. Shift over to open source.
    2. Invest 25--50% of what you currently pay for proprietary software into helping maintain and enhance open source software.
    3. Enjoy the economic benefits well maintained free software brings to every aspect of your digital infrastructure at no extra cost.
  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Open source will innovate so much faster if properly funded, without the shackles of copyright and companies holding advancements secret and not releasing innovations on purpose as long as they hold on edge on "competition". Competition is only important because of proprietary capitalism, remove capitalism and directly reward the workers and innovation happens for innovation's sake.

    Can't wait for this to be proven in practice, and to be able to apply that more widely to society. Godspeed Europe

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 95 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    MoRe OpTiOnS iS bAd FoR cOmPeTiTiOn

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 89 points 6 months ago

    Thanks for confirming we're on the right track, google.

  • source
  • [–] 82 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    You guys don’t see what they’re scared shitless about? It’s the fear of an EU-based true open source Android fork/competitor.

    Also when they say FOSS will not contribute to “economic growth”, they mean Alphabet’s. Greedy pigs.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 76 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Funny considering how much of Google was built on open software.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 75 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

    the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

    Wrong.

    creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement

    Wrong.

    Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms

    What does he not understand about digital sovereignty?

    According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users

    No, for Google. Also, wrong.

    that the market moves faster than legislation and warns, that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.”

    If that's the price to avoid technofaschism... And, again, wrong.

    Tl;dr: stop wanking, Walker.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 71 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Remember, whenever you see a patently weak argument like this from a trillion dollar corporation, they’re not saying it because they think anyone will believe it. They’re saying it to give the corrupt politicians in their pocket some way to pull a straight face when voting in the corporation’s favour.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 66 points 6 months ago

    Fuck you, Google.

  • source
  • [–] 63 points 6 months ago

    The leopard of consequences is hungry for tech oligarch faces.

    Eat, you majestic creature. And godspeed.

  • source
  • [–] 61 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection

    No, this is fundamentally impossible. The US has the Cloud Act. As long as that exists, this is a nonstarter.

    The US can change their laws to not have a global wiretap and secret backdoor warrant program, then this would be possible.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 60 points 6 months ago*

    I'm not sure why anyone in EU, bloc or therefore canada should even care what an American company opinion would be at this point. They said they were moving on. They did.

  • source
  • [–] 60 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    All these craptastic US tech companies originally started on internationally developed free and open source software. They hoover up capital and talent then abuse their market power. Fuck them all.

    They all run on Linux - Torvalds is a Swedish speaking Finn. Greg KH who maintains stable is German. So many libraries and core system contributions by Germans like Drepper and Poettering. Youtube ran on mysql for years from Finnish Widenius. Google built a lot of stuff with Python - from Dutch Guido van Rossum and c++ from Danish Stroustrup. All of the video and audio sites rely heavily on ffmpeg, orginally from French Fabrice Bellard. Lots of them also using virtualisation stuff which includes qemu, also from Bellard. So much comp sci research from Europe and UK. Chrome and Safari originated with KDE (German) code. Europe did all the heavy lifting while the US took all the profits. I'm not even European but every country has the same experience. They have no idea how they are viewed.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 56 points 6 months ago

    We literally removed "don't be evil" from our mission statement, but you can totally trust us, bro.

    Google

  • source
  • [–] 54 points 6 months ago

    Car company complains that city is developing Metro system.

  • source
  • [–] 53 points 6 months ago

    Kiss my European ass, Google.

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Google criticizes

    Fuck you and shut the fuck up. Google has zero right to say anything, let alone criticize anything.

    Do no evil, remember? I remember.

    Fuck you

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 46 points 6 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 45 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    If nobody in Europe paid for Google products think of the economic benefit to Europe if all that saved cash was then spent by the people on European products and services.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 44 points 6 months ago

    More desperate pleas by Google. I just saw an article by some Google shill that made a case against self hosting. Next they'll try to make it illegal.

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    "It's afraid" still image from Starship Troopers

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 42 points 6 months ago

    really fun fuck you google

  • source
  • [+] 42 points 6 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
    [–] 40 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not surprised that they are against it but very surprised that they so blatantly expose their reasoning. If you don't buy my product, it's not good for me, therefore it is not a good idea 🤷

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 40 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

    As long as they’re a US company US law can force them to hand over data. No matter where the servers are located.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 39 points 6 months ago

    Not good for whose growth? Because it'll be perfectly fine for eu. The fact that google is upset about this, should be all the tell you need to know you're on the right path.

  • source
  • [+] 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    [+] 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 37 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Tough shit, you supported the MAGA movement and Europe, thankfully, reacted accordingly. Simply put, the good folks in the EU lost faith in the USA.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 6 months ago

    How DARE they try to ELIMINATE our Services after ALL the MONEY we Poured in Donald Trump's POCKETS!

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Drug dealer critizises addict's intention to get clean.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 6 months ago

    Oh no! Big evil company doesn't like Europe is realizing they need alternatives? Shocker!

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 6 months ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 6 months ago

    I don't think google is the right source talking competitiveness on this matter..

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 6 months ago

    Probably the most resounding endorsement they could hope for

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›