Only 17% of Arab American voters say they will vote for Biden in 2024, according to a new poll.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 86 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Didn't Trump literally already say he was bringing back the Muslim ban and making it worse? But ok, I guess vote for him anyway. Most republican voters vote against their own interests all the time so they'll fit right in until they're deported.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    If Arabs don't vote for Joe or stay home pouting on the couch on election day, the only thing they'll accomplish is to enable the tragic national nightmare of a second trump misadministration and a whole new tsunami of violent, stochastic terrorism-driven Islamophobia that has already cost innocent Muslim Americans their lives

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 38 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    It's too bad Americans can only choose between senile old people or criminals to be president

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (39 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (37 children)

    That's a lot of words to say "at least he's not Trump!!" Sure would be nice if democrats had a strategy other than that. You know, like actually trying to improve things. What incentive do democrats have to improve things when your vote is guaranteed because not voting for democrats "is a vote for fascism"? I mean, here is Biden, pledging EVEN MORE billions of dollars to Israel as they ramp up their ethnic cleansing efforts. Democrats being fascists with a kinder image isn't good enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 37 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    It sucks to vote for the least of two evils. But not voting at all is effectively half a vote for the worst of the two. Yeah, it feels like youre resisting if you refuse to play when there's only a two party system. Not gonna accept only having a choice between two crappy people and their parties! Hold out by not voting! Or by voting for someone who has NO chance ? Well great, then you up your chances of next having no choice at all -- with just one insane party and its dictator when they make it permanent. Not acting makes you responsible for installing Emperor Trump. Dint kid yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (21 children)

    It'll have to be good enough for the next 4 years. When the choice is no longer incumbent vs actual monsters...

    Pounding fists on the table saying it's unacceptable is just little kid energy; like breaking your own toys cuz you're mad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I don't necessarily disagree, but the other side of that coin is that every election is painted this way in America.

    Not saying it isn't true for Trump, but supposing he loses in 24, you don't think the GOP will stay sufficiently shitty that in 28 they send him up again, or a younger old white guy who's still sufficiently horrible?

    It's a very very calculated part of the two party system that the Other Guy is offensive enough to those on the fringes of the tent to shame, scare, or guilt them into voting for "their" guy.

    Again, I don't disagree with you, especially in this case, but it's exactly how the parties are designed to work to perpetuate the illusion of choice. If the Democrats can just point to Trump to convince progressives to keep voting for their guy, when or why would they ever shift their platform in a direction to court more progressive voters?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (16 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    That's the reality of the two party system. They don't matter, because what are they ultimately gonna do, vote for the other guy?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 33 points 2 years ago (33 children)

    Man the amount of people in this thread that can't understand that some people don't want to vote for someone who is supporting a genocide of their own people. "But Trump is worse!" Well, yeah, but this is still pretty fucking bad, and were I American I'd hesitate to support it too. It's not like most of these people will vote for Trump, they'll just stay home or vote for a 3rd party.

  • source
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (20 children)

    Those comments make me so angry. There is a genocide being perpetrated on Arabs in Palestine, and Biden is actively defending it. It should be absolutely no surprise that Muslims and Arabs are not going to vote for a genocide denying turd actively trying to fund and arm the perpetrator.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • load more comments (16 replies)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    Man, the amount of people in this thread that don't understand downballot exists, and that's the best tool to force direction changes within upballot. I always vote for the least worst on the upballot and exclusively progressive+educated in the downballot.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    “Look, we’re not silly—we know what Trump has done to our communities,” says Amer Zahr, the president of the Dearborn-based New Generation for Palestine. But when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, he continues, “The policies are basically the same. Except when Trump does it, you get some pushback from the Democratic Party.”

    Positively delusional.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Right? Like great, vote for the GOP, they will definitely care about Arab policies. /s

    Foolish and short sighted. Sorry but 2/3 of the US population supports Israel in this conflict, and likely all of the remaining 1/3 is from the young liberal left. Biden is an old democrat, expecting any other result was naive.

    But sure, elect an authoritarian Trump. Then instead of protesting, just get thrown in a camp for not being white and christian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    It's like they've forgotten Trump's policies on Israel that were explicitly reversals of Dem policy during Obama, and even reversals of former, less jingoistically pro-Israel policies of the pre-Obama GOP. Which, mind, were major wins for the far-right government of Bibi which is currently in power in Israel, and eked into power by a fucking thread.

    I guess the great thing about being an American is how well everyone assimilates, regardless of ethnic origin. They're just following in the long and storied American tradition of being fucking clueless about foreign affairs and having the political memories of goldfish.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    So they're going to vote for Trump? Trump is a very strong ally to Israel. Trump certified their land grab of the golan heights. Best guess is he would certify the land grab of all of gaza

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    No, they just probably won't vote at all or vote for a third party who won't win.

    Not that it's a good idea, but that's what will probably happen. And tbf this is more of a problem resulting from the two party system, so most people don't like to follow the logic of vote for the lesser evil when there are many other countries that don't force you into such a situation on literally every political decision.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    GAH ZAH. Have you seen this place? Rubble everywhere. You can't live there. It's in Israel, isn't it? I say, let the Israelis have their pile of rubble. Those Palestinians don't live there anymore, can't imagine why! They should take all of that rubble, crush it down into TINY TINY pebbles, and dump it all on Hilary's front lawn!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I still don't understand why the US only has a two-party system, and both of them suck ass. Can't they elect someone else who actually has actual goals that actually benefit the country and its people? Why aren't they allowed to do something like this? So much for freedom.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The two party system is the system we have because we believe in the efficacy of it. I know we make the "vote blue no matter who" arguments but thats fucking exactly what they want. The parties are perfectly positioned to secure different sections of voters and lock them in. Where I felt like I wouldnt want another choice two weeks ago, I am far more likely to consider it now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The two party system is the system we have because we believe in the efficacy of it.

    No, noone believes in the efficacy of it. It is the system you have because it is now beyond anyone's powers to reform it. It is a mixture of archaic and wilfully corrupt laws and rules, which has petrified into something that disproportionally serves one minority fringe and its interests over all others.

    The majority of people does not think it serves their interests, but they are powerless to change it exactly because the small but powerful group whom it actually benefits has disproportionate power to prevent it from happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    TBF, if Time magazine is saying this then it should cause at least some general concern as we're a week + one year out from the vote. Single issue voters exist. I'm not addressing/excusing the rationale behind this and I can't believe I'm calling this pain down on myself, but where are all the "big tent Dems" at? I mean, we can rationalize pandering to the right to pick up house moms that would otherwise vote for Trump, but the concerns of the Arab Americans are a bridge to far? This seems like a blind spot that could come back to haunt us like not campaigning in the midwest in 16'.

    Before I get the "blue no matter whos" choir on me as well, just remember there's a saying that proceeded that; "Democrats vote with their heart" and we need to be very mindful of everyone that relates to, as we can't afford to lose anyone. Hate doesn't need to be rational. It often finds it's best fuel to be emotion.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I mean, man, if I had my way, I'd say fuck Israel, either reduce aid drastically or demand more accountability regarding civilian casualties. But unfortunately, a good half of Dem voters are still quite content to support Israel unconditionally. I absolutely am in favor of reaching out to the Arab-American community, but I doubt it's going to happen anytime soon.

    Honestly, the 'best' realistic outcome is that many of us will remember this shitshow, especially those who are young enough to still be forming opinions on international affairs, and unconditional support for Israel will drop further with upcoming voting age cohorts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (8 children)
    load more comments (8 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›