top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 190 points 2 years ago (14 children)

It's a shame how obvious they're working their corporate bullying cards simply because of money. Imagine if I created a product called Google and tried to sue Google for it. That would be ridiculous, right? Well, that's what Facebook is doing, just with money.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    It's not what Facebook is doing. The company has owned the trademark for over a decade, and Facebook is trying to strong arm them into giving it up.

    This is also in the UK where they somewhat stand up to companies like Facebook. McDonald's lost their trademark for the Big Mac for trying to do this exact same thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Facebook isn’t suing Threads. The longtime trademark holder is suing Facebook.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Okay, pointing out the analogy of "Imagine if I created a product called Google and tried to sue Google for it [...] Well, that’s what Facebook is doing" doesn't match this situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    Facebook created a product called Threads and is attempting to bully Threads Software into taking their name. I was creating a hypothetical situation about how most small companies can't just steal a company trademark, because it's rightfully someone else's. However, if you are a larger company and, have enough money, and have shit ethics, then you can just kinda... ignore that, and for some reason, the US is happy to let wallets write the law.

    They did this with Meta, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 76 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Didn't they pull the same shit back when they changed the company name to Meta?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 76 points 2 years ago (20 children)

    Fuck I wish my old elementary school friends and parents wouldn't use Messenger. I'm eternslly stuck on that platform.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    i saw one person do something like this: messages JOIN ME ON SIGNAL(or anything not owned by Facebook and amazon) IF YOU DON'T WANT TO WELL WILL LOSE CONTACT SO PLEASE JOIN ME

    im not sure on how well this will work but maybe exclude you're family but try to get them to atleast WhatsApp but even better a private messager also consider xmpp/jabber and matrix for jabber i recommend calyx institute jabber server

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 59 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    I predict that years will go by and it'll still be called Threads.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Just like Meta is a stolen name. Facebook doesn’t care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 years ago (21 children)

    Well, since Meta/Facebook will probably be pulling out of the UK along with every other social media company, that’s hardly a “threat”

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] [S] 60 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    You mean, "That's hardly a 'thread?'"

    I'll see myself out

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (16 replies)
    [–] 35 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    I wouldn't be surprised if FB/Meta tried to just settle out of court and pay them off.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    They will. This was most likely planned by their legal team in advance, will cost Facebook a negligible amount compared to their revenue and marked as a “risk.” And when they settle it will be a planned business expense, like a fine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    The company has said that they've spent a decade building their "brand" under that name. So, if they're pushing for a big payout, they intend it to be gargantuan rather than the usual payoff. Changing their name would essentially be starting over in some ways. And the confusion they claim as their reason for action is a legit thing.

    I'm not saying that isn't their goal behind the scenes, but FB tried to buy the name and failed, so I have a feeling they aren't looking for the usual quiet payoff that's the goal of that type of action.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Isn't this just business news?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    Threads isn't even a good name lol

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Never download the Meta Threads.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Take the L, Facebook!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›