No shit, Sherlock. Except that "AI" is a wrongly attributed marketing buzzword.
People assumed X, but in one experiment the result was Y.
And in his many experiments the result was in fact X, if it was just 1 on which it was Y?
I don't actually disagree with the article, I'm just pointing out the title is meaningless.
This study is over 6 months old, why is Fortune.com only writing about it now?
A version of this story originally published on Fortune.com on July 20, 2025.
Nevermind, I guess...
I got an email couple of weeks ago with invitation to some paid study about AI. They were looking for programmers that would solve some tasks with and with AI help. I didn't have time or felt like participating but if I did I would 100% work slower on task with AI just to help derail the pro-AI narrative. It's not in my interest to help promote it. Just saying...
Programming
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev