this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1075 points (90.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

30039 readers
811 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Oh man the rightoids came out of the woods for this shower thought.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Only if the source checks out

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Any argument based on "us vs them" is flawed by default.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I always trust the streets. People lie. Governments lie. News lies. But the streets. The streets never lie.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Gotta be careful roaming the streets, tho.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Does anyone know if there is a way to see which wiki articles are edited the most? I don't mean new topics or edits because there's a lot of new info. I mean potential back-and-forth edits where there is disagreement on facts (or one viewpoint denies a fact, etc.).

If that exists, I'd be curious to know what articles they are (obviously probably religion or politics). On the other side, those articles that have remained unedited for a long time are probably pretty rock solid, assuming they also get traffic.*

*I'm literally thinking out loud here and am sure there are many other factors to consider

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (32 children)

Lol, everything is sourced.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (11 children)

No. There are plenty of articles with the "needs citations" tag.

But even of the ones that are? A LOT of people never actually read the sources and you have plenty of wild claims that are not at all supported by their citation. Plenty of "celebrities" have even talked about how it was a huge hassle to get something changed because the lie was cited... with something unrelated.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"a huge hassle"

Step 1. Remove the unfounded claim

Step 2. Go to the talk page explaining why you removed it

Step 3. If someone puts it back, edit war them, tag needs citation, call them out in the talk page, get the article locked by an admin, etc etc etc. These things happen all the time, and 95% of the time it gets corrected as long as someone gives a damn

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Have you ever looked at the sources? Some pages have some insane blog spam "sources" linked.

load more comments (29 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›