Finally. This was what was keeping me from using ntfs on Linux
post
The last time I had a time zone issue was tomorrow and I still can't figure out how I got there
I cant imagine that being terribly useful but I'm sure now that I've said it some one will come up with a reason for why I'm wrong.
I set the timestamps of my music to its original release date, so that I can sort it chronologically... OK, I don't actually do that, but now I'm tempted
Seriously though, what are the most common use cases here?
Having the original UNIX source code with fully preserved timestamps?
It may have taken a while, but the Year of the Linux Desktop has finally arrived in 1969!
Won't switching from an unsigned 64-bit integer to a signed one of the same size effectively halve how far into the future they can handle dates, exhausting it in 2038?
The 2038 problem is from using a 32 bit int
You're right, I was thinking about 32-bit timestamps. Definitely not an issue for 64-bits.
@FishFace @chrisbit ... and halving the range of a 64-bit number effectively makes it 63-bit. That will give us plenty of time still!
You only need one sign bit right? So I think you are only losing 1 bit. Not 32.
all 18 comments