477
submitted 2 months ago by avidamoeba@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] MrNobody@quokk.au 66 points 2 months ago

If hypothetically a false headline on a reputable site led to an incident involving injury or death, could Google be found liable in anyway?

[-] Gonzako@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

No because on the google.com eula that you sign by having someone on your family ever Google something redeems them of any liability and gives them a right to sacrifice your first born to AI

[-] cole@lemdro.id 36 points 2 months ago

EULAs are not legally enforceable anyways

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 12 points 2 months ago

They're becoming closer and closer to it though. Scary court decisions are being made, it won't be long before someone tests it as a legal argument

[-] Gonzako@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago
[-] Pamasich@kbin.earth 3 points 2 months ago

Liability waivers don't apply outside the US.

[-] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Oh you didn't see the clause that supercedes that? Silly consumer not reading everything.

/s

[-] Gonzako@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

How are other countries enforcing that liability tho?

[-] zo0@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago

~~If hypothetically~~ when a false headline on a reputable site led to an incident involving injury or death, ~~could Google~~ is anyone found liable in anyway?

rarely

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

I doubt it.

[-] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Are you cooking something up?

[-] UnculturedSwine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

They could hypothetically. Will they? Probably not.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Possibly. The BBC made a big row about Apple's headlines: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2v778x85yo

[-] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 2 months ago

Thanks for the archive link.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So what’s happening here is Google is feeding headlines into a model with the instructions to generate a title of exactly 4 words.

Every example is 4 words.

Why they think 4 words is enough to communicate meaningfully, I do not know. The other thing is whether novel they’re shoving into their products for free is awful, hence the making things up and not knowing in the context of a video game exploit is not the same as the general use of the word.

[-] capuccino@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

"Trump cry like baby". Huh.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

I don't think meaningful communication is a KPI they optinize for. More likely time spent in the Discover feed.

[-] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago

4 words fit better in the box or on the screen is what I assume.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Four words seems a fair metric for the shortest descriptive headline. I mean, can you beat "Foot Heads Arms Body"? The only shorter ones are "man bites dog", "Dewey defeats Truman", or something as simple as "WAR" when everyone already knows the details and this is just the official announcement.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 2 months ago

Clickbait and ai bullshit from Google feed is pretty much all I've ever seen from them in the past year.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

didn't this happen already? the thing is generating AI responses instead of showing me the results first and then I'm not clicking on it because I'm a person

it's also de-listing a ton of websites and subpages of websites and continuing to scrape them with Gemini anyway

[-] fonix232@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago

Apple had to turn it off for their sunmary mode after backlash, even though the option always had the "these summaries are generated by AI and can be inaccurate" warnings placed prominently.

Google doing this shit without warning or notice will get them in shit water. News portals and reporters are generally not too fond of their articles being completely misrepresented.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

it's not just a matter of misrepresentation. it's directing traffic away from the websites which are creating the content, maybe depriving them of every means that they have of monetizing it

[-] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago

Well, the loss of traffic is a knock-on effect of the misrepresentation. So is the fact that every other portal will try to sling shit at the ones affected by it.

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah my Ublock Origin block filter is nearly 2000 lines, almost all of it blocking shit like this. If it ever gets nuked on Firefox then I'm going full Kaczynski.

[-] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Wow yet another example of forcing AI into something that the AI just makes worse. Must be a day that ends in Y

[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

It is Jeudi

[-] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 7 points 2 months ago

I kind of like the idea of a system allowing me to automatically remove clickbait and sensationalism from headlines and replace it with a good summary. But I really hate how Google is pushing that without customization, without consent and in such a crappy state.

[-] bytesonbike@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Same. I don't mind it if it was done by a group of writers who can finetune it or people who just hate that shit. But but Google's job is to get more clicks and get more eyeballs. So I don't trust them to game their own systems.

[-] Avicenna@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

Great make every effort to suck the soul out of internet, of which there is already very little remaining. Then you can jack off to all the money you made while watching the internet that is %100 bots and racists

[-] lb_o@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

We're just here on Lemmy That part google is making will remain dead

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

How else are we gonna carry around a pack full of skeleton parts for our necrarmy

this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
477 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

80634 readers
3308 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS