this sounds like horrible slop, but i will grant that the u.s. military finding out about what is effectively an eldritch horror, a godlike manifestation of fear itself, and thinking "yeah we can make this a weapon to fight communists," is a historically coherent response.
post
They're trying to Stranger Things it.
The Soviets did the trail of tears
Except in Stranger Things the Russians are actually the bad guys. There's the potential Pennywise turns on the people trying to control it, the US military, because that's usually how horror works.
Or course they could still fuck it up, too.
Yeah, in the later seasons. But the villain in the first season is in the US government. Stranger Things was always slop. But Season 1 was at least well made, not rabidly anti-communist, slop.
Now it's just a parody of itself. Grossly anti-communist and orientalist, tonally inconsistent, and just plain bad. That show's production has dragged on for so long, that the kids are all adults, now, and we're multiple nostalgia cycles away from giving a shit about the 80s anymore.
I don't know, this sucks but it doesn't suck much more than
spoilers for the book and CW for awful shit
a group of preteens having group sex inside a sewer pipe
Yeah once I found out that King, as man in his what 30's, wrote a child orgy in one of his books I noped the fuck out. It's no wonder why The Shining (movie) Kubrick didn't want anything to really do with King.
And a whole part of Wizard & Glass I gotta skip when rereading dark tower, fuck king 🙄
The awful slop that is prestige TV and the awful slop that is Stephen King books, combined.
Come on, the book is a million times better than this. This is beyond idiotic.
I have never read it because the two Stephen King books I have read, The Shining and The Green Mile, are two of the worst books I have ever read and I refuse to read any more from the author who could produce such garbage.
Human AI writer
Fueled by cocaine and problematic racial tropes
I still do love The Stand and Dark Tower
The Stand is probably the only book of his that I actually really like, even though it has plenty of problems of its own
I loved him as a kid but reading his stuff as an adult is not easy... I remember thinking Pet Sematary was so fucking good and scary when I was around 10. But I just read it again last week and it does not hold up much at all. He’s just a straight up bad writer. Like I felt second hand embarrassment from his writing style at points. Funny how many point to his essay on writing as a good reference for someone trying to learn how to be an author. I think he sometimes comes up with good story ideas and that can be enough to sit through and finish the occasional one but it is 100% slop as the writing itself has zero artistic merit but he thinks he has the chops to go on for 500+ pages. I actually do kinda enjoy the shining from an entertainment perspective and it’s so far the only one I’ve liked that I’ve revisited as an adult but it’s still wicked far from an impressive piece of writing.
problematic shit aside, his writing just feels like he has no filter telling him whether a sentence is necessary or not. like he will first hint at something then immediately clarify it plainly. or he will "show, not tell. then tell anyway" about a character, something that was already mentioned in dialogue.
"Hapton Home, Maine, population 320. Only a few families still live here, ever since that fateful day. Yep, it's a small town alright. And a terrible thing happened here. Bobby Bingus still remembers that day in the 50s when he came home from school to see his mother at the house where he and his mother lived.
"Hi mom! Sure is nice to be a young boomer in the 50s. Feels like only good things will come to me and my friends, young kids the same age as me, ya know." said Bobby, hopeful about life and feeling young and full of life, even though things might not go the way he hoped.
"
" said his mom.
I read On Writing just recently and thought it was a very helpful and cogent book on the writing process, it gave me a lot of valuable insights for my own writing. I had to square how insightful the book was with the fact that it's King writing it, who's writing I've never cared for much. It has been awhile (decades) since I read any of his stuff, but I suspect that much written in On Writing is advice he probably doesn't strictly follow writing his own books. Still a good book nonetheless. King is an odd duck, that's for sure.
Hm I should definitely revisit it then. It’s totally possible for me to imagine a situation where he is able to write well on the writing process and provide good info while himself not being a writer I’d really give much credit. Stranger things have happened haha
The book has something way worse, as another comment noted. This is at least pretty funny.
I might get yelled at for this, but as weird as it is, I don't actually think the ending of the book is that bad in the context of the story.
Conceptually, it's kind of gross and bad but the real issue is how it is written, the detail given and the type of detail and characterization, especially the end.
I’m mixed on King. On the one hand, I think that among the group of authors who are megabestsellers, whose books stock every airport bookstore in the country, he’s the best of the best. I think he’s an above average talent who’s spent a lifetime churning out mediocre novels, with a few really good ones under his belt. But he could be two or three times the writer he is if he would only do some drafting and revision.
And I don’t have any particular problem with that scene in IT. Sure, it’s gross and weird but IT is a novel that’s deliberately gross and weird. Much of the first half of the novel is an escalating series of scenes of child murder, interspersed with scenes of spousal abuse and racial violence. The book is written like a deliberate psychic assault on the reader. So I really don’t see the scene as King going “look at these sexy children.”
Though I will say that the mystification and magical Bagger Vance-ing of native people seems in line with what I got out of that bit in IT about the shaman dream magic ritual.
Pennywise often transforms into the very things his victims fear most—since the monster feeds on fright
The US government captures Pennywise and sends him to Russia but the first person Pennywise meets is Gorbachev so he becomes Stalin and Russia goes communist again with Pennywise in charge and continues to take on the form of Stalin when the collective west shits itself.
Okay I'd watch this.
Great bit to take Stephen King’s incredibly unsubtle metaphor for child abuse and turn it into what sounds like marvel-brained slop. There’s no way AI wasn’t generating the scripts for this one.
It will remain true to the book though (they will include a child gangbang
)
if a monster who feeds on fear would go anywhere, itd go to israel ofcourse, those zionists are so easily frightened, all IT has to do is look remotely arab and theyd shit their pants. I can already picture Pennywise in a paraglider over Tel Aviv, IT'd be so satiated by all the fearfull zionists, the semen extraction brigade would be so busy they won't know where to extract first
I scan read "Pennywize" as "Paddington" and that increased my confusion dramatically.
Derry
My brain automatically corrects this to Doire, but it turns out it's not the one in Ireland.

all 49 comments