2
We just surpassed Beehaw in total users putting us at the second most populated instance. (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Thoughts? Seems like we are one of the only bigger instances with open sign ups still as well.

Edit: didn’t mean to start any instance tribalism. Like others have said, its not a competition, and its better that users are spread across instances than piling into one. Just think it’s interesting to watch the different instances grow and change and see where people end up congregating.

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 3 years ago

Pretty cool. What's the most populated? Where can I track this info? (I agree it's not a competition, but am curious.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    The list of instances with user count and other stats: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/list

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I have no thoughts, but it shouldn't be a competition and it should be shared across all instances to avoid one instance being dominated/too expensive to host

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    That’s right. I hope Lemmy.world isn’t heading in that direction and Ruud has to take it down because it costs too much money to run the servers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    lemmy.world has the IT Operations technical experience to keep their site up, the others need to catch up.

    I'm developing some Kubernetes tools to make it easy for people to create their own scalable instances like lemmy.world has, so I'm hoping that that can make it a bit easier.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Sorry, let me clarify. My point was that I hope Ruud doesn’t have to start shelling out thousands of dollars because everyone decides to register there and he needs to keep increasing capacity.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Thing is, lemmy doesn't support clustering/horizontal scaling. So there are limits to how much increasing you can do. You can beef up with a database cluster, add a separate reverse proxy, and increase the specs of the hardware lemmy is running on (but hardware can't be expanded limitless), but that's about it. Once you hit the limit of what a single instance of the lemmy software can handle, you cannot scale anymore. Pretty sure you will hit the limit long before you reach thousands of dollars.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Hopefully by then, Lemmy's source is augmented to support HA/horizontal scaling

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Yeah. But horizontal scaling (well horizontal scaling in a system like this where you need clustering so the instances talk to each other) is hard. And I think there are a lot of other things that need to be polished, added and worked on before that. It would probably also need somebody with knowledge of clustering to start contributing. I think step 1 needs to be that the dev team needs more help properly tuning the database use. The database is very inefficient, and they lack the skill to improve it:

    We are in desperate need of SQL experts, as my SQL skills are very mediocre. ^https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2877^

    So getting help improving the database is probably the #1 thing that can be done to deal with the scaling problem.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    I fully agree - there's no excuse why the DB should be falling over when I've seen a single postgres instance (with a read replica, granted) handle >1M users just fine.

    Unfortunately my SQL skills haven't improved since my DB class in university, so I won't be much help. I'll be keeping an eye on the repo of course, and I can give some consulting/guidance or even open some PRs myself when they decide to implement horizontal scaling.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Yeah. I'm in the same boat. My SQL skills aren't impressive either since there are other people at work that handle optimization. Haven't used rust either (yet) so cannot really contribute there either. Though I'm considering potentially starting work on a cross platform mobile app. I haven't worked with mobile apps for a good six or seven years, so I feel like it's high time I get back up to speed. (But knowing me, I'll end up making something half finished and the start procrastinating)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent